to backup the whole data with ftp. So my idea was to call
rsync like this:
rsync -v -a 'ftp://1.2.3.4/' my_folder
But this gives me:
ftp: unknown host
ftp: unknown host
ftp: Unknown host
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 17:41 +, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
I am sorry, the rsync algorithm needs to execute rsync on the server.
Since ftp does not allow executing remote programs (as ssh does), even
if there exists a rsync executable installed in the server and you have
permission to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 17:41 +, Manuel
López-Ibáñez wrote:
I am sorry, the rsync algorithm needs to execute
rsync on the server.
Since ftp does not allow executing remote
programs (as ssh does), even
if there exists a rsync executable installed in
the server and
Hi all,
I am facing an error while trying to use the --temp-dir option
in the rsync version 2.4.8. I am aware that it is an old version. But
due to space constrain, i am to use this version. The rsync command with
options is below:
rsync -aI --stats --timeout=60 --temp-dir=/tmp
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 07:13:28PM +0530, Vijay Ram Chitrapu (RCVIJAYD) wrote:
I am facing an error while trying to use the --temp-dir option
in the rsync version 2.4.8.
I know of no such rsync version (there was a 2.4.6).
cannot create /tmp/.flash.dat.x
The temp-dir option is meant
Permanent failures : 1
Succesfully Sent : 0
+- Detailed report for recipients with permanent error (if any) ---+
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : Fatal error
Relay : relay2.kataweb.it [213.92.40.184] [opt=0x]
Messages: remote says : 550
is
your best resource for figuring out how to trouble-shoot a remote rsync
failure. One of the first suggestions on that page is to upgrade rsync
(on both ends!) to 2.6.6 for better error reporting of remote problems.
Upgrading will also improve the timeout handling (which may be why the
remote
resource for figuring out how to trouble-shoot a remote rsyncfailure.One of the first suggestions on that page is to upgrade rsync
(on both ends!) to 2.6.6 for better error reporting of remote problems.Upgrading will also improve the timeout handling (which may be why theremote rsync is going away
message --From: stoil valchkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 1, 2005 3:05 PMSubject: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(359)To: rsync@lists.samba.orgHi,
I've been experiencing this error for 2 weeks now. I don't now ehat
could be a reason. I've tried to update with latest
:14:14: ./
2005-11-08 04:14:41: acimsdb.zip
2005-11-08 04:14:42: inflate returned -3 (0 bytes)2005-11-08 04:14:42:
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at token.c(416)
2005-11-08 04:14:42: rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (254 bytes
read so far)
2005-11-08 04:14:42
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:33:36AM -0500, James W. Beauchamp wrote:
2005-11-08 04:14:42: inflate returned -3 (0 bytes)2005-11-08 04:14:42:
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at token.c(416)
Sounds like you're using an older version of rsync -- I fixed a
compression bug
wrote:
2005-11-08 04:14:42: inflate returned -3 (0 bytes)2005-11-08 04:14:42:
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at token.c(416)
Sounds like you're using an older version of rsync -- I fixed a
compression bug like that a couple versions ago. Alternately, turn off
-z
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3245
Summary: error messages not precise enough
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.6
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
know if this was the reason but this is
1st time for more than 2 weeks now it succeeded!
Do you have ideas what is the reason?-- Forwarded message --From: stoil valchkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 1, 2005 3:05 PMSubject: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(359
Hi,
I've been experiencing this error for 2 weeks now. I don't now ehat
could be a reason. I've tried to update with latest sources, but the
same result (I'm not sure for line number, but the rest is the same).
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (5881604 bytes received so far
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 01:14:16PM -0500, Kevin Karwaski wrote:
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (12 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(189)
As the Issues and Debugging page mentions (see item #3 at this URL:
http://rsync.samba.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Everyone,
I've been running into a protocol error when attempting to rsync files
between to hosts over ssh. Here is the line I've been using with the
verbosity cranked up:
rsync -a -e ssh -l test /localpath/to/sync xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx::module
||INVALID
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-27 17:29 ---
This is a request for information, not a bug report. The best place to ask
questions is on the mailing list.
As long as I'm here, I might as well answer:
A usage error means that you got
to this system:
[1710][~]$ rsync -av /tmp/foo.txt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cygdrive/c/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
rsync: not found
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(189)
[1701][~]$
The only thing rsync will say
Actually, rsync is not the transport in this scenario, SSH is. The
Windows system doesn't need to have rsync installed. I'm using rsync
because I want to sync many files within the directory tree (not shown
in my example, which was simplified to just foo.txt to show the error).
-Anthony
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to install rsync. There is an error coming while running configure script.
The error says that your compiler can't create executables. You'll need
to figure out what is wrong with your compiler setup. Configure found
gcc on your system
Hi,
I am trying to install rsync. There is an error coming while running configure
script. I have attached the log file also.
Please help me as soon as possible.
Regards,
Parag Natekar
config.log
Description: Binary data
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:26:41PM +0800, David Schulz wrote:
rsync error: unexplained error (code -4169475) at main.c(692)
The code returned at main.c line 692 came from the wait_process()
function, which called WEXITSTATUS() on a value returned by waitpid().
One thing I noticed that was wrong
error on my servers rsyncd.log file upon
running the above rsync command on the client:
rsync error: unexplained error (code -4169475) at main.c(692)
This seems to happen random, not necessarily every time there is a new file.
Sometimes it all works without this error, sometimes it works, but has
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 08:51:41PM -0700, Ian Webber wrote:
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes: phase unknown [sender]:
Connection reset by peer (104)
See the issues and debugging page of the website for instructions on
how to go about debugging a failure on the remote end of
to
considerShouldIWorryAbout/ShouldIWorryAbout/Should I Worry About...
Drinking.avirsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes: phase
"unknown" [sender]: Connection reset by peer (104)rsync: read error:
Connection reset by peer (104)rsync error: error in rsync protocol data
stream (code 12) a
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3076
Summary: Unsuitable error message in flist.c.
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3076
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3009
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
that is responsible for the MacOS
customizations and ask them about this error.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
That sounds like some weirdness introduced by the MacOS patches. You
should probably look for someone that is responsible for the MacOS
customizations and ask them about this error.
If you are using the rsync binary supplied with 10.4, you should
submit a bug to Apple via http
Patrick M McNeal wrote:
That sounds like some weirdness introduced by the MacOS patches. You
should probably look for someone that is responsible for the MacOS
customizations and ask them about this error.
If you are using the rsync binary supplied with 10.4, you should
submit a bug
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:01:23AM -0500, Lozano, Marcus wrote:
2005/08/11 14:30:13 [18092] rsync denied on module log from unknown (0.0.0.0)
Are you using daemon-mode over rsh/ssh? If so, the only way rsync has
to discover the remote IP address is out of the environment. It tries
Lee Cullens wrote:
Patrick M McNeal wrote:
That sounds like some weirdness introduced by the MacOS patches. You
should probably look for someone that is responsible for the MacOS
customizations and ask them about this error.
If you are using the rsync binary supplied with 10.4, you
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:31:10PM -0400, Lee Cullens wrote:
So, the option to override this behavior would be --inplace I
assume, and do yo know of any caveats regarding such locally?
If you're doing a local transfer, (which implies --whole-file), the only
adverse effect of --inplace would be
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:57:13AM -0400, Lee Cullens wrote:
Where I am unclear is if in not using -H a hard link, (i.e. a
duplicate directory entry for a file) will result in duplicated files?
Yes, all separate filenames will be separate files without -H.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 09:57:13AM -0400, Lee Cullens wrote:
Where I am unclear is if in not using -H a hard link, (i.e. a
duplicate directory entry for a file) will result in duplicated files?
Yes, all separate filenames will be separate files without -H.
that bring
me back to the conflict in OS X :-(
The specific error message encountered with --inplace already included
an tested an adding just -H for testing:
rsync: open /Volumes/LaCie_Disk_B/System/Library/CoreServices/BootX
failed: Operation not permitted (1)
Maybe I can come up
option. Unfortunately that bring
me back to the conflict in OS X :-(
The specific error message encountered with --inplace already included
an tested an adding just -H for testing:
rsync: open /Volumes/LaCie_Disk_B/System/Library/CoreServices/BootX
failed: Operation not permitted (1)
Maybe
Another work-around here would be in my differential update script to
simply clear /System/Library/CoreServices/* each time and let it be
recopied. Versus the exclude work-around it has more assurance of
maintaining system consistency - but it's still just a work-around to
the root problem.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:43:50PM -0400, Lee Cullens wrote:
The most logical place to ask this question is this rsync forum, but
no one has yet even acknowledged the issue.
I was hoping that a MacOS user would respond and help you out since this
issue appears to be specific to MacOS.
As for
Lee Cullens wrote:
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:43:50PM -0400, Lee Cullens wrote:
The most logical place to ask this question is this rsync forum, but
no one has yet even acknowledged the issue.
I was hoping that a MacOS user would respond and help you out since
I create a full direct clone with asr and am working at differentially
updating that clone with rsync. The main problem I have is that unless
(in rsync) I exclude at least /System/Library/CoreServices/* I get the
rsync error:
rsync: rename
/Volumes/LaCie_Disk_B/System/Library/CoreServices
Hello,
I am using rsync for the first time.
I have rsync 2.6.5 running on Solaris 9. It was built with gcc-2.95.
We are experiencing a reverse lookup host error in rsyncd.log when the
client with ip addy 180.X.XX.XX
tries to access rsync on my Solaris box.
2005/08/11 14:30:13 [18092] rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3009
Summary: build error on sinix: off64_t unknown
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.5
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
]::repositories I get:
@ERROR: access denied to repositories from localhost (::1)
You allow an IPv4 address '127.0.0.1', however the connection appears to
come from an IPv6 address '::1'. Maybe use ::1 instead of 127.0.0.1 in
the hosts allow line?
Paul Slootman
--
To unsubscribe or change
= Subversion Repositories
path = /usr/local/repositories
read only = no
list = yes
hosts allow = 127.0.0.1
auth users = username
secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets
However running rsync [EMAIL PROTECTED]::repositories I get:
@ERROR: access denied to repositories from localhost (::1)
rsync
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:00:54AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@ERROR: access denied to repositories from localhost (::1)
Did you check the log file to see what the daemon had to say about the
failure? Perhaps the permissions are wrong on your secrets file (which
would cause rsync to ignore
On Wed 06 Jul 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply, this version of rsync is going to be used by a group
of people, I need to convince them that this is not a real error, do you
have any document which talks about this rsync behavior ?
Let's put it another way: where
I'm not sure it is a real error or not, when I run 'rsync' with no options on AIX 5.3, it has an error at the bottom of usage message, see below
# rsync
...
...
Use rsync --daemon --help to see the daemon-mode command-line options.
Please see the rsync(1) and rsyncd.conf(5) man
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:33:36PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rsync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.c(1097)
Running rsync without any options *is* a syntax error. If all you want
to see is the help, use the --help option.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https
: connection unexpectedly closed (8 bytes received so far) [sender]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at /
SourceCache/rsync/rsync-20/rsync/io.c(359)
The receiver is the same as the sender since I am doing a local backup.
The only bizarre thing I might have done
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:43:01AM +0200, Alexander Lamb wrote:
I am doing something really simple. It worked twice and now fails for
an unknown reason.
The output you showed indicates that rsync finished building the file
list, transferred that list from the sender to the receiver, the
to 1048576 bytes, did move
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (8 bytes received so far) [sender]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at /
SourceCache/rsync/rsync-20/rsync/io.c(359)
--([EMAIL PROTECTED])-(11|ttyp1)-(11:36|06/29/2005)--
--
Alexander Lamb
Service
Thanks Wayne.. Your mail answered my query perfectly..
-sanal
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:49:54PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there any way to ignore these errors when i do file transfer using
rsync?
What do you mean by ignore? They're just warnings, so rsync ignores
them already for
Title: Message
Hello
all,
I'm using rsync client in Linux box and cygwin rsync daemon in Win 2k machine.
When i do transfer of directory contents "C:/Documents And
Settings/Administrator/Local Settings/Application Data/Microsoft/Windows" using
rsync, i'm getting the follo
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 08:49:54PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to ignore these errors when i do file transfer using
rsync?
What do you mean by ignore? They're just warnings, so rsync ignores
them already for most things, just not deletions that happen after the
warnings
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2784
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-13 11:56 ---
disregard my last comment, the code does act as you suggest when not using the
ssh as the transport layer. Are there any known work arounds for this behavior?
--
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2784
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2784
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2784
Summary: rsync gives following error: buffer overflow in
receive_file_entry
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2785
Summary: rsync gives following error: buffer overflow in
receive_file_entry
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2784
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-09 11:20 ---
*** Bug 2785 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2785
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Hi all,
When the following console error is displayed ??
regs
LAKS
sh: rsync: not found
sh: rsync: not found
sh: rsync: not found
sh: rsync: not found
sh: rsync: not found
sh: rsync: not found
sh: rsync: not found
sh: rsync: not found
sh: rsync: not found
sh: rsync: not found
sh: rsync
Hi,
My nightly rsync jobs recently began to fail. I don't recall making any
modifications to the rsync config files or upgrading rsync. Below is the error
I receive when I try to rsync the home directory of serverA to serverB. Is
there anything obviously wrong? Thanks.
serverA rsync # rsync
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 12:07:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2005/06/07 11:29:35 [20870] auth failed on module home from
serverA.domain.com (192.168.1.3)
If you upgrade the server to 2.6.5, rsync will log the reason that the
auth failed on that log-file line (password mismatch, missing
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-07 10:56 ---
Created an attachment (id=1264)
-- (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1264action=view)
A partial fix
My version of the quick-fix that only deals with
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the detail in your report. Error messages, log messages,
config files all in one email. :)
/var/log/rsyncd.log on ServerB
2005/06/07 11:29:24 [22075] rsyncd version 2.6.0 starting, listening on port
873
2005/06/07 11:29:35 [20870
, but that was 5 days prior to last successful rsync job, so
doubt that caused it either. I'm stumped.
Thanks for the help guys!
Thomas
John Van Essen wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the detail in your report. Error messages, log messages,
config files all in one email
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:08:56PM -0400, Govindarajan, Bhadri wrote:
Can you be more specific on how to running
the remote shell command directly to see if it gives the error.
When you run rsync with the -vv option, it outputs the ssh command it is
running to connect to the other machine. Run
: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(150)
I am able to scp or ssh to the from the machines. I have proper keys.
Where does the Variable syntax come from., I have 5 folders in include
file. So this error
is a simple text file with 2 lines. When i did this with scp,
it worked.
Thanks
Bhadri
- Original Message -
From: Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: rsync@lists.samba.org
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: please help -- Variable syntax error
On Fri 03 Jun 2005, Bhadri
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 11:58:43PM -0400, Bhadri N Govindarajan wrote:
I just changed the machine names. When i execute the script i get
Variable syntax
Judging from the command you used, I assume that this error is coming
from the remote shell, and probably indicates an error in that host's
- Original Message -
From: Govindarajan, Bhadri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Wayne Davison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2005 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: please help -- Variable syntax error
Hello
I even tried this. I tried to scp and ssh from the remote machine to the
local
)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(150)
I am able to scp or ssh to the from the machines. I have proper keys.
Where does the Variable syntax come from., I have 5 folders in include
file. So this error is repeated 5 times.
I tried
rsync -vv testfile mydestmachine
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2758
Summary: File exists error using options -b and --backup-dir
with device files.
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: AIX
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2745
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
Hi,
I am using rsync to replicate files from one system to another one.
While doing rsync, sometimes it fails with the following error.
# usr/bin/rsync -zaR -e ssh --partial /home/guest/replicate/new/new_1
remote:/
mkstemp home/guest/replicate/new/.new_1.4J9w2F failed: Invalid
/Users/nick/tmp/other
Looks pretty regular to me...
The true non-regular file is actually at the far end, on plum:
$ ls -l ~/tmp/other
lrwxr-xr-x 1 nick nick 4 Apr 22 11:22 /home/nick/tmp/other - file
Shouldn't the local rsync be reporting the error with the remote pathname?
What
/local/etc/snapback/snapback.exclude -e ssh --delete
peru.cbm.mercyships.org:/ /home/backup/peru/hourly.0/
bunch of lines deleted
wrote 873039 bytes read 194103171 bytes 103848.85 bytes/sec
total size is 148629419278 speedup is 762.30
rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code
peru.cbm.mercyships.org:/ /home/backup/peru/hourly.0/
bunch of lines deleted
wrote 873039 bytes read 194103171 bytes
103848.85 bytes/sectotal size is 148629419278 speedup is
762.30rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at
main.c(1045)
How do I correct a
code 23
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:42:09PM -0500, Don Golden wrote:
How do I correct a code 23...
What you do is to look in that bunch of lines deleted section for
the error(s) that rsync output during the transfer. It may be a
directory that couldn't be entered, or a file that couldn't be read,
etc
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 09:33:22AM -0600, Dale Bohl wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] batch]# ./obsession_.sh
Batch file ./batch/obsession_.rsync_flist open error: No such file or
directory
You're in a different dir relative to the batch file when trying to read
it than you were when creating
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 09:33:22AM -0600, Dale Bohl wrote:
Batch file ./batch/obsession_.rsync_flist open error: No such file or
directory
I missed this in my first reply (though I already told Dale this): the
suffix, .rsync_flist, indicates that rsync is an older version because
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1508
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
I'm starting to run rsync 2.6.3 on a new system and receive the
following message
IO error encountered - skipping file deletion
as output whether or not there are files that should be deleted (which
they're not)
on the remote system. Except for the delete capability, everything
else seems
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:52:46AM -0800, Stan Silverman wrote:
IO error encountered - skipping file deletion
You'll need to look through the output to see what prior error rsync
sent you -- it will tell you if there is a file or a directory or
whatever that rsync was unable to open. See also
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 06:54:16AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
Another update. Only some of the hardlinks seem to be actually missing.
Does this make any sense ?
Yes, that gives me something to go on for testing. I should hopefully
be able to reproduce what is going on.
..wayne..
--
To
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
Invalid packet at end of run [sender]
OK, this was a combination of --delay-updates and --hard-links that was
causing a problem at the end of the run. I've checked in a fix to CVS,
and the latest nightly tar file has this fix
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
Invalid packet at end of run [sender]
OK, this was a combination of --delay-updates and --hard-links that was
causing a problem at the end of the run. I've checked in a fix to CVS,
Dunno if this has any relationship (or even if this is the right place to
break in)
SERVER: rsync-HEAD-20050314-2227GMT
rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at io.c(915)
rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at sender.c(157)
CLIENT: rsync version 2.6.3 protocol version 29
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:39:54PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dunno if this has any relationship (or even if this is the right place to
break in)
Seems like a decent place to jump in to me... Welcome!
SERVER: rsync-HEAD-20050314-2227GMT
rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2
Wayne, others,
Using the same version on server and client, I still got this error. This
was still based on last night's CVS (HEAD-20050314-1745GMT) and I am
certain both side's versions are identical. :)
...
source/sudosh-1.4.7-1.rf.src.rpm
98373 100% 536.69kB
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
Invalid packet at end of run [sender]
It would help to know what options you had enabled.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:46AM +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
Invalid packet at end of run [sender]
It would help to know what options you had enabled.
Damn, I was planning to include those. Here they are:
-avHl --progress --delete-after
(--delay-updates). I seem to be missing the files and the
next run they're transfered again. Probably related to the error because
the first few updates worked without receiving this error.
-- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word
transfered or not updated at the
end of the run (--delay-updates). I seem to be missing the files and the
next run they're transfered again. Probably related to the error because
the first few updates worked without receiving this error.
Another update. Only some of the hardlinks seem
801 - 900 of 1491 matches
Mail list logo
