e
> San Jose, CA 95131 SERI trenwick@usvlsjs1 | limit one more time!
> - Eagles
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/15/2001 10:36:47
> Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
> S
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:25:03PM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
> How do I go about "registering" this bug with the include file.
I don't think there's any point registering it until you have better
confirmed that that is indeed the problem. Also, if developers have no way
of reproducing th
EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/15/2001 10:36:47
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
Subject: RE: FW: Problem with large include files
Classification:
How do I go about "registering" this bug with the include
al Message-
From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2001 01:24
To: Wilson, Mark - MST
Cc: RSync List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: FW: Problem with large include files
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:31:23PM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
...
> Do you have any idea what the maxi
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:31:23PM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
...
> Do you have any idea what the maximum number of files you can have in an
> include file is (for the current version)?
No, I don't. It probably depends on a lot of variables.
> How do you want your test on 2.3.2 done? ie L
-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Mark - MST
Sent: Tuesday, 15 May 2001 15:31
To: 'Dave Dykstra'
Subject: RE: Problem with large include files
> No, rsync can't run over UDP. Perhaps there are some TCP parameters you
> can tweak. I wouldn't be surprised if the combination of the hig
> Try rsync 2.3.2 on both ends and see what the result is.
> What transport method are you using (rsh, ssh, or rsync --daemon mode)?
--daemon mode. Some tests a colleague did showed a performance advantage.
> Come to think of it, I know from experience that rsync is able to keep the
> TCP q
