On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:25:03PM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
How do I go about registering this bug with the include file.
I don't think there's any point registering it until you have better
confirmed that that is indeed the problem. Also, if developers have no way
of reproducing the
!
- Eagles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/15/2001 10:36:47
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
Subject:RE: FW: Problem with large include files
Classification:
How do I go about registering this bug
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:31:23PM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
...
Do you have any idea what the maximum number of files you can have in an
include file is (for the current version)?
No, I don't. It probably depends on a lot of variables.
How do you want your test on 2.3.2 done? ie LAN
-
From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2001 01:24
To: Wilson, Mark - MST
Cc: RSync List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: FW: Problem with large include files
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:31:23PM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
...
Do you have any idea what the maximum number
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/15/2001 10:36:47
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
Subject:RE: FW: Problem with large include files
Classification:
How do I go about registering this bug with the include file.
It would
Try rsync 2.3.2 on both ends and see what the result is.
What transport method are you using (rsh, ssh, or rsync --daemon mode)?
--daemon mode. Some tests a colleague did showed a performance advantage.
Come to think of it, I know from experience that rsync is able to keep the
TCP
