On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Swapnil wrote:
> 1. I want to know whether rsync server and client are available for
> * Novell servers
> * Windows 2003
> * Windows 2000 server
> * Windows NT
> * Windows XP
> * Xservers
> * Mac OS X
> * Mac OS 9
I am unaware
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> > 5. I want to know If rsync Server is receiving the data of around 1
> > GB every day what is harware configuration recommended for the better
> > performance.
>
> We maintain just under 1TB per server with 20 or 30 backup targets and
> don't see th
archive but without
success, so I hope you can help me. Please forgive me if this is a
trivial question.
Here it is a sketch of my home directory:
$HOME ---|
|--- foo/
|...
|--- Library/|
|--- bar/
|--- ...
so there are a
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far)
[sender]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(359)
Need help to resove the issue
Thanks
VC
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tir
What do this uid =0 anfd gid = 0 mean? Can it pose any security issues.
Thanks,
VC
[root]
path = /
auth users = XXX
secrets file = /usr/local/etc/rsyncd.secrets
uid = 0
gid = 0
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of sp
I'm not sure keepalive is working the way I think it's supposed to.
Here's my test. I've got a large file (approx 1 gig) on the rsync
server, and I append a character on the end to make it slightly
different. I fire up rsync on the client side and everything
works fine until I hit the timeout val
/thismachine/
I am using the above commnd to take backups and i need to take a only incremental backups Which option i have to useand how to specify in source machine and target machine.
I think i have to use --backup-dir=DIR option or anything else.
PLease help me how to take only incremental backups daily
are in teh list but not ont
he other backup
Thanks for any help. Scott
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at compat.c(64)
I really need to fix this and i seaced on the net and this is shell problem on remote machine and i don't know which file and where to look i am running as root with bash shell.
Thanks for your help
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
Hi Everyone!
Can someone tell me the exact mehtod to install Rsync from a linuxmachine? thanks!
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
osely, and compresses
files during transfer to speed it up. If you would like to watch it
happen, add --progress for cool status view.
What is the rsync command to be used ?
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3075671
Sent from
s to refresh target server we remove all
datafiles on target and rsync all datafiles again from source. My question
is if we leave the older datafiles and rsync will it be faster ?
Currently I use "rsync -czv" c for checksum.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 11:43 -0800, lsk wrote:
> lsk: This is oracle database the header information(timestamp..etc) on each
> datafile constantly changes which might be very small change but the data
> inside most of the datafiles are same they wont change much. New oracle
> datafiles will be added
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 11:43 -0800, lsk wrote:
Currently I use "rsync -czv" c for checksum.
If each data file's first few bytes ("header information") change
between rsync transfers, then --checksum buys you nothing. Normally
rsync will skip transferring a file if the
Thanks Matt since morning I am running some real time tests with 7 GB
datafile as you had suggested I should post back the results as soon as that
finishes...and we could find out whether rsync algorithm works as it should.
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 14:32 -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
> At a minimum, when an Oracle database is opened and closed, the timestamps on
> all datafiles will be updated because the header blocks will get updated with
> a
> new SCN. So the timestamps on all datafiles will always look different the
more on what do you mean by "atomicity"
3) We need to RSYNC a 5 TB worth of datafiles and the create a target
database by replicating the source so I need the best option to RSYNC only
the changes instead of the whole 5 TB database.
Thanks,
lsk
--
View this message in context:
http://www.
Hello,
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 05:58 -0800, lsk wrote:
> I am back with the results..here are the options I tried on a 7.0 GB file.
>
> =>No file on target (rm the file on the target and rsync) with "rsync -czv"
> it took 1 hr.
> =>File on target with but header info change on source with "rsync -
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:58:26AM -0800, lsk wrote:
> 2) And Matt could explain little more on what do you mean by "atomicity"
What he meant is that, without --inplace, rsync creates an updated file
and moves it into place, making the update atomic (i.e. none of the
destination files are ever in
sync -zv --no-whole-file --stats /d01/app/testfile2.dbf
> tarser:/t01/app/testfile2.dbf
>
> Thanks,
> lsk.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3113956
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:08 -0800, lsk wrote:
> /// lsk:- Thanks for the clarification Wayne, in my case no one
> would be allowed to use the destination file until the process is
> complete. As soon as my destination server is upgraded to the newer
> version of rsync which supports --inpla
Workin' on getting rsync setup in a test envioronment and not sure what
needs to be done on the servers side to be able to perform the backup from
the HPUX box. I do have the rsync app in place on the HPUX system however
can't connect to the servers port 22 ... have searched all over the
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:08 -0800, lsk wrote:
/// lsk:- Thanks for the clarification Wayne, in my case no one
would be allowed to use the destination file until the process is
complete. As soon as my destination server is upgraded to the newer
version of rsync whic
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 18:40 -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
> I did something similar to what lsk is doing a few months back, I believe
> using
> rsync 2.6.5. I wrote a script to query the database for all the datafiles and
> rsync'ed them individually by specifying the full path to the file. What I
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 18:40 -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
I did something similar to what lsk is doing a few months back, I believe using
rsync 2.6.5. I wrote a script to query the database for all the datafiles and
rsync'ed them individually by specifying the full path to th
alling it for each
> file will wait for several network round trips per file.
Thanks Matt. I thought that might be the case.
--
//*** lsk => Could you give an example with syntax for rsync using file
option "--files-rom=FILE".
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
h
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 06:58 -0800, lsk wrote:
> Could you give an example with syntax for rsync using file
> option "--files-rom=FILE".
If my-list in the current directory contains
a
b
b/c
b/d
b/d/e ,
then the command
Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-27 at 06:58 -0800, lsk wrote:
Could you give an example with syntax for rsync using file
option "--files-rom=FILE".
If my-list in the current directory contains
a
b
b/c
b/d
b/d
File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds
Total bytes sent: 184089
Total bytes received: 254026
sent 184089 bytes received 254026 bytes 2131.95 bytes/sec
total size is 167780352 speedup is 382.96
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t117
File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds
Total bytes sent: 184089
Total bytes received: 254026
sent 184089 bytes received 254026 bytes 2131.95 bytes/sec
total size is 167780352 speedup is 382.96
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t117
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 09:20 -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
> rsync -a srchost:/ / --files-from=dbf-list
>
> and dbf-list would contain this:
>
> p02/oradata/OSID/redo01.log
> p03/oradata/OSID/redo02.log
> p04/oradata/OSID/redo03.log
> p01/oradata/OSID/system01.dbf
> p04/oradata/OSID/undotbs01.dbf
> p0
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 07:43 -0800, lsk wrote:
> Matt I have strange results to report I transferred 300 oracle datafiles of
> total 30 GB in size. Using the option " rsync -zv --no-whole-file --stats"
> it took 1:15 min and using "rsync -cvz" options earlier had took 1:25 min so
> there wasn't much
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:45:20AM -0800, lsk wrote:
>
>
> Matt I have strange results to report I transferred 300 oracle datafiles of
> total 30 GB in size. Using the option " rsync -zv --no-whole-file --stats"
> it took 1:15 min and using "rsync -cvz" options earlier had took 1:25 min so
> the
Here's my contribution to information on performance. There are two different
cases. The first is a 1.6gb file that has a low volume of updates. The second
case is a 4gb file that has a high volume. All are non-local transfers. I do not
understand the exceeding long times shown in the last two r
en create a database using control file so I am desperate of trying
all options that would suffice my need to get this done in less amount of
time.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3215145
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:07:14PM -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
> I do not understand the exceeding long times shown in the last two
> runs.
Since the user/sys CPU time didn't also mushroom, I would suggest that
you check to see if your system ran out of free memory and started to
thrash as memory wa
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:07:14PM -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
I do not understand the exceeding long times shown in the last two
runs.
Since the user/sys CPU time didn't also mushroom, I would suggest that
you check to see if your system ran out of free memory and started t
Linus Hicks wrote:
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 02:07:14PM -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
I do not understand the exceeding long times shown in the last two
runs.
Since the user/sys CPU time didn't also mushroom, I would suggest that
you check to see if your system ran out of free
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 09:21:25AM -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
> I'm transferring one file, which is obvious from my command line. Is the
> FAQ incorrect?
The FAQ is incomplete in how the size of the file can affect the sender's
memory. If the destination file already exists, the sender needs to b
Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 09:21:25AM -0500, Linus Hicks wrote:
I'm transferring one file, which is obvious from my command line. Is the
FAQ incorrect?
The FAQ is incomplete in how the size of the file can affect the sender's
memory. If the destination file already exists, t
--On Friday, March 03, 2006 9:21 AM -0500 Linus Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
This is certainly not true for the source machine. It typically has 70gb
free (it's still running a 32-bit Oracle database server). The
destination machine started out with about 2.8gb free. I will run it
again and
Carson Gaspar wrote:
--On Friday, March 03, 2006 9:21 AM -0500 Linus Hicks
Please configure your email client to not quote email addresses...
wrote:
This is certainly not true for the source machine. It typically has 70gb
free (it's still running a 32-bit Oracle database server). The
desti
a.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3320951
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 06:40:20AM -0800, lsk wrote:
> - with datafiles in dsetination takes more time
I assume you could use --whole-file instead of removing the destination
files manually.
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before post
option and network connection
fails. I need to trransfer files that are on 40 drives abt (16000 files) I
am trying to find the best possible solution to transfer it as fast i can
without any issues.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a354
ain a total of 15500 files and total
size of all oracle datafiles is 4 tb.
Other info i recently upgraded to RSYNC version "2.6.6 protocol version 29"
on destination server...
Source server rsync version 2.6.5 protocol version 29
Thanks for your quick help...
--
View this message in c
Hi,
We've got a current rsync deployment that's just gone live and will
eventually have over 200 clients. The server is running on Windows
Server 2003 (no choice :( ) with the cygwin libs and the clients are all
Linux - all is well so far. Two questions regarding log files:
1) We need more d
Thanks Wayne, the formatting works just fine now. I had assumed that
this was on by default.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
; u...@1.1.1.1:/mnt/Data/backup
>
> Thanks in advance for the help.
>
Got it figured out. Need the trailing slash on the source.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Folder-Structure-Help-tp26918986p26921168.html
Sent from the Samba - rsync mailing list archive at Nabble.c
Hello All,
*rsync -av --files-from=FILE --delete-before src/ dest/*
the above mentioned command not working. I want to delete extra files on
the dest that are not on the source and transferring the selected files
from FILE simultaneously. Please suggest me how to do that ??
--
Regards
Garvit S
t that the source is proper",
and I sent a patch for limiting the max number of deleted files in a run.
It seems it was included in some way since rsync --help now shows:
--max-delete=NUMdon't delete more than NUM files
it's not perfect but a reasonable guarantee aga
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 09:48:13AM -0800, Tyler Hardison wrote:
>
> Now my question is, does anyone have a suggestion of a test that I can run
> prior to rsync (which is run through a crontab) that I can use to stop
> rsync? The server actually wasn't rebooted for about two hours so at one
> poin
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 11:52:19AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> Could anyone explain to me why I'm getting the following error messages
> during rsync -a operation? Thanks.
>
> error 1:
> Integer overflow - attempted 64 bit offset
> rsync error: requested action not supported (code 4)
I have so far been unable to get rsync to work properly in a test setup.
Does anyone have any ideas?
Both PCs are running RedHat 7.2.
The Server:
IP Address 192.168.0.202
Server Name: RH72TB
hosts.allow ALL: 192.168.0.201
rsyncd.conf:
[testmodule]
path = /tmp
The Client:
IP Address 192.168
ips, n9hmg on AIM
perl -e 'print pack(,
19061,29556,8289,28271,29800,25970,8304,25970,27680,26721,25451,25970),
".\n" '
"There are some who call me Tim?"
Joe Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/19/2002 07:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Tim,
thanks for the help...but, it still isn't working.
any more ideas?
I have tried:
rsync -avv --include "/film/jonah/**/sourceimages/*.tif" --exclude "*" /film /tmp
rsync -avv --include "/film/jonah/*/sourceimages/*.tif" --exclude "*"
++
Tim,
thanks for the help...but, it still isn't working.
any more ideas?
I have tried:
rsync -avv --include "/film/jonah/**/sourceimages/*.tif" --exclude "*"
/film /tmp
rsync -a
Seems to me that the simplest solution is to name the directory
explicitly:
rsync -a --include "*/" --include "*.tif" --exclude "*" /film/jonah /tmp/film
To accomplish the same thing using includes, you could do this:
rsync -a --include /jonah --include "/jonah/**/" --include "*.tif" \
tory to the local machine. then
i plan on using the same rsync command to periodically check to see if there
has been any changes in any of the tif's.
> rsync is awesome, but uses a lot of memory with a lot of files, so there's
> no real advantage to using it in your situation.
yeah.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:55:50AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Seems to me that the simplest solution is to name the directory
> explicitly:
>
> rsync -a --include "*/" --include "*.tif" --exclude "*" /film/jonah /tmp/film
>
> To accomplish the same thing using includes, you could do this:
>
and 3-2-1 Penguin videos. Also, I live in the Chicago area and have run
> into a guy in my hometown's new library a couple times who told me he works
> on Penguin 3. I'm delighted to know that rsync is helping Big Idea.
Wonderful! You should run out and buy the new Larryboy video that came out Tuesday.
It is 2D and animated in/with Flash.
Thanks for all your help,
joe
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 03:24:39PM -0600, Joe Rice wrote:
>
>
> Dave Dykstra([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:17:46AM -0600:
> > Let me explain Wayne's answer a little further. The main thing you need to
> > understand is that the exclude algorithm is applied recursively so any time
>
Hello,
Any help on the following issue will be appreciated.
How do I delete files or directories in my first level of directory that is
specified as host. Here is an example :
rsync -avz --delete ${SOURCE_HOST}:/mlinkfam/extract/sccs/pa/*
/mlinkfam/extract/sccs/pa
Giving above command I
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:23:20AM -0500, Webmaster of rcrrich.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a little problem and I am trying hard to understand but
> it is very hard when you get to my age and truly when things change so fast
> it just keeps getting harder to keep up but I am trying. Wh
Hi,
...
> rsync -av --exclude=/foo/test/dir1/ /foo/test serv2:/foo
> and the exclude still does not work.
The following works:
rsync -av --exclude=/test/dir1/ /foo/test serv2:/foo
Why?
Because one should think the exclude pathnames are *relative* ones to
the destination directory.
In your c
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am having *massive* problems trying to exclude a single directory from an rsync.
>
> I have serv1 and serv2. I am trying to rsync /foo/test from serv1 to
> /foo on serv2 I want to exclude the directory /foo/test/dir1 So I
> Hi all,
>
> I am having *massive* problems trying to exclude a single directory from an rsync.
>
> I have serv1 and serv2. I am trying to rsync /foo/test from serv1 to /foo on serv2
> I want to exclude the directory /foo/test/dir1 So I try:
>
> rsync -av --exclude-from=/foo/rsync.exclude
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:53:10AM -0600, daniel wrote:
> Thank you for clarifying the issue with regard to the fact that the
> exclude pattern is relative to the destination path.
No, it's relative to the root of the transfer -- i.e. the names that the
two sides have in common.
> The fact that:
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:53:10AM -0600, daniel wrote:
> > Thank you for clarifying the issue with regard to the fact that the
> > exclude pattern is relative to the destination path.
>
> No, it's relative to the root of the transfer -- i.e. the names that the
> two sides have in common.
>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:44:54AM -0600, daniel wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:53:10AM -0600, daniel wrote:
> > > Thank you for clarifying the issue with regard to the fact that the
> > > exclude pattern is relative to the destination path.
You are welcome.
> >
> > No, it's relative
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You need to exchange public keys with the server (go to .ssh directory
in home directory and pull out .pub key and copy the content of it
into .authorized_keys in home directory on the server do the same with
the receiving server)
Vinicius Carvalho
Thanks :) I've just tested without the ssh (all machines are inside a
DMZ) and it worked, not as expected but did ;)
As I was saying we would like to have a mirror right, well what i did
was start the daemon on 2 machines, and then have a cron script to run
the rsync -avz ... command
it almost wo
On 1/5/07, Vinicius Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
6)modified the file on node A (the one from node B)
7)node A ran the script before node B, so it got the version from B
(which was older then the one on A)
Right...if the scripts notice that a file differs between node A and
node B, they n
Hi all,
I am running the following command from winXP:
rsync -av -e "bin\ssh -i trans_key\access.key -l julian -p 2227"
192.168.200.254::julian .\julian\
and getting the following output:
rsync: Failed to dup/close: Socket operation on non-socket (108)
rsync error: error in IPC code (code 14)
Dear List,
Currently, I read this in clientserver.c, line 148.
motd = lp_motd_file();
I have googled, but didn't the definition of char *lp_motd_file(void).
Can anyone help to explain the following code segment. Many thanks.
#line 147 ~ 160, in clientserver.c, version 3.0.5
> if (!a
#x27;s having trouble creating the files with no extension. Can
anybody help me find a way to work around this? Thanks for your time!
Regards,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Greetings and salutations, rsync users. I have a problem. I'm hoping that
someone out there could perhaps provide a hand.
I've been trying to transfer large amounts of data (lots of data, lots of
files) via rsync over an encrypted TCP tunnel, but I seem to be continually
getting hangs in the trans
On Jan 25, 2005, at 14:22, Andrea Riciputi wrote:
but it doesn't work. Any suggestion?
Try putting a * in your exclude expression: "*/Library/*"
--
Rick
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-ques
Thanks Rick,
actually
rsync -a --include "~/Library/bar/" --exclude "*/Library/*" source
target
doesn't work as expected, but the following:
rsync -a --include "Library/bar/" --exclude "*/Library/*" source target
does work! Could anyone explain what's going on here, even if I've read
rsync man p
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 11:22:57PM +0100, Andrea Riciputi wrote:
> rsync -a --include "~/Library/bar/" --exclude "Library/" source target
Read the section of the man page on how excludes are anchored to the
base of the transfer. There are extensive examples in the modern
version (which you can fi
On Mon 25 Apr 2005, VC123 wrote:
> :
>
> rsync /export/home/amg/* [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/export/home/amg
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
> rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far)
> [sender]
> rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(359)
Try running
Thanks Paul,
Tried with more options like --rsync-path= and it worked.
Regards,
VC
--- Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon 25 Apr 2005, VC123 wrote:
> > :
> >
> > rsync /export/home/amg/* [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/export/home/amg
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password:
> > rsync: connection u
, April 26, 2005 3:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Need Help with rsyncd.conf
What do this uid =0 anfd gid = 0 mean? Can it pose any security issues.
Thanks,
VC
[root]
path = /
auth users = XXX
secrets file = /usr/local/etc/rsyncd.secrets
uid = 0
gid = 0
d stuff like
> list = false
> read only = true
> depending on what access you need
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> VC123
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTEC
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Need Help with rsyncd.conf
Thnaks for yr reply.How can I restrict the client to not be able to
upload any file or write any file if rsyncd.conf contains uid=0 and
gid=0 ?
Thanks,
VC
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> root access (root by any name
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 04:43:55PM -0500, Steve Sether wrote:
> Now my understanding was that the keepalive feature was supposed to
> prevent this from ever happening.
Yes, that's certainly what it's supposed to prevent.
> Am I doing something wrong?
Maybe. You must be using at least 2.6.4 on b
) at io.c(420)
_exit_cleanup(code=12, file=io.c, line=420): about to call exit(12)
> One potential "fix" you could try is to change the initialization of
> the "lull_mod" value in generator.c to 1. That would make it call
> maybe_send_keepalive() after every file.
&g
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:22:56AM -0500, Steve Sether wrote:
> I'm assuming that wouldn't help this bug, since my test is only
> sending one file.
Ahh, interesting. The keep-alive protection is currently only in the
generator, and it guards against long lulls that occur during
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 12:08:44PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> So, it would be good to extend the keep-alive code to have the sender
> periodically spit out keep-alive packets to the receiver while it is
> busy reading the checksum data from the generator.
This turns out to be very easy -- I tes
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 12:28:20PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I'll attach a patch that you can try out with 2.6.5pre1 or the
> latest "nightly" tar file (or probably even 2.6.4 [...]
I was a little hasty with that patch -- the sender needs to use the
global allowed_lull var, otherwise maybe_sen
I applied this patch to 2.6.5pre1 and recompiled both sides
and am still getting the same error. My timeout is set to
59 seconds. Do you want strace output again?
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 12:50:40PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 12:28:20PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> >
a the client's command-line. Thus, the client cannot help to keep
the connection alive. Since the client is the sender, my patch to make
the sender send keep-alive messages during checksum gaps can have no
effect without having a timeout in effect. You should try running the
command again wit
ia the client's command-line. Thus, the client cannot help to keep
> the connection alive. Since the client is the sender, my patch to make
> the sender send keep-alive messages during checksum gaps can have no
> effect without having a timeout in effect. You should try running the
&
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 07:20:42PM -0500, Steve Sether wrote:
> Truly strange results. I tried --timeout=59 on the client side
> (which is what my server config is set to), and got identical results
> from before (timeout). I then tried a smaller value than what's
> specified on the server conf
I don't think it's the blocksize. I'm still not terribly familiar with
the inner workings of rsync, but from what I see maybe_send_keepalive() is
never sending a keepalive on the sender side. It looks like the test
in maybe_send_keepalive() is never passed. Right now that test is:
if (time(NULL)
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:23:38AM -0500, Steve Sether wrote:
> But it looks to me like last_io is reset on the sender side every
> time it receives a packet (as well as when it sends a packet).
Ah yes -- how silly of me. Yes, that will prevent my patch from working
right. I was fooled into thin
That patch works perfectly. Thanks!
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 04:36:55PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 11:23:38AM -0500, Steve Sether wrote:
> > But it looks to me like last_io is reset on the sender side every
> > time it receives a packet (as well as when it sends a packet
:/export/opt/geneva/temp/testfile
even for this command i get the same error.
How do i overcome this error. I tried everything. Is it something to
do with c-shell. Because my previous scripts where working in ksh. I
really dont understand.
Please help .
Thanks.
--
Thanks
G.Bhadri
--
To
I would like to understand the capabilities of GNU rsync software /
utility. This is used for syncing file systems / file level data across
two systems. I specifically would like to know its capabilities in
syncing files –
1) How does it replicate data changes to files – entire file or only
t
cribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, p
101 - 200 of 566 matches
Mail list logo
