On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 12:10:03AM -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
> Tomasz Ciolek wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 04:16:38PM -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
> >>>
> ...
> 2.5.6 (protocol 26) from cvs on SCO Open Server 5.0.6
> both machines are the same version of OS and the same copy of
Tomasz Ciolek wrote:
I assume you mean you have a single 2gb file, not 2gb worth worth of
files .
The 2gb barrier is probably your problem. Rsync will try to create a file lists, and with a 2gb files in store you will make large RAM usage a norm.
Now when a file is being updated, you might
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 04:16:38PM -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
> > ...
> > 2.5.6 (protocol 26) from cvs on SCO Open Server 5.0.6
> > both machines are the same version of OS and the same copy of rsync.
> > ...
> > file on LIVE is 0 bytes
> > file on BACKUP is 2 gigs
> >
> > on BACKUP you run:
>
Does SCO support files over 2GB in size?
TMC
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 04:16:38PM -0400, Brian K. White wrote:
> Hi, I'm still waiting for my list subscription but if I don't send in this
> bug report now I won't for who-knows-how-long and I want to get it in
>
> I'm using 2.5.6 compiled fro
Hi, I'm still waiting for my list subscription but if I don't send in this
bug report now I won't for who-knows-how-long and I want to get it in
I'm using 2.5.6 compiled from
cvs on SCO Open Server 5.0.6
bothe machines are the same version of OS and the same copy of rsync.
on my live machine
