Hello list,
I'm looking for a free ticket/issue tracker for where I work. My boss wants
such a system for internal use (so public access/customer relations isn't a big
concern). I've installed, set up, and even modified the code of OSTicket, but I
keep running into little problems that I have
Le 23/08/2016 à 22:59, Hugo Escobar a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I need to be able to stop submitting a "Public Reply" correspondence
> based on a evaluation that returns a Boolean value.
>
> This decision must be taken when the user clicks the "Update Ticket" button
>
> Everything I have tried fails
Hi,
I need to be able to stop submitting a "Public Reply" correspondence
based on a evaluation that returns a Boolean value.
This decision must be taken when the user clicks the "Update Ticket" button
Everything I have tried fails because the form is always submitted.
Any help will be highly
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Tom Corcoran wrote:
> Hi
>
> Noob question here.
> Trying to use rt-shredder from a bash script using a bash date variable to
> wipeout tickets but shredder seems to ignore my date parameter which I
> assume is because its badly formatted.
>
>
Hi
Noob question here.
Trying to use rt-shredder from a bash script using a bash date variable
to wipeout tickets but shredder seems to ignore my date parameter which
I assume is because its badly formatted.
Have gotten this to work using a fixed date/time -
/#!/bin/sh//
//filename=`date
Hello,
In our RT-instance the group "Everyone" has the following three rights on
almost all queues: CreateTicket, ReplyToTicket, SeeQueue.
Some experimenting points to the following:
CreateTicket is the only one needed to move a ticket from queue A to queue B.
The only problem being that queue
I beg to differ about the attachments table, in our setup we rely on
customfields and there parameters. We have quite a few tickets that does
not have any attachments.
If you do not write anything in the message body when you create a
ticket (through web-ui or REST), there will be no attachment
Le 23/08/2016 à 04:09, Stephen Switzer a écrit :
> Emmanuel,
>
>This is awesome, thanks for the input! I didn't think to do that.
> Does this work with the self-service interface, too?
>
of course, because it uses core RT features/ACLs
> Also, on set-up... I did these steps, creating a