Re: [rt-users] Attachment storage

2009-07-30 Thread Kenneth Marshall
Hi Michael, Like Jesse mentioned, 200MB-2GB is really not terribly large and should be easily handled by most current DBs. Oracle, PostgreSQL, and MySQL definitely can. One thing to consider is if your users will be running a content search within the attachments. This will require a full scan of

Re: [rt-users] Attachment storage

2009-07-30 Thread Jo Rhett
On Jul 29, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Michael Ellis wrote: I am considering attaching .wav files of the voicemail left on our helpdesk to rt tickets, but I'm worried about performance/stability if I start putting this amount of binary data in the system. I ran this thought by our local DB guy and

[rt-users] Attachment storage

2009-07-29 Thread Michael Ellis
I am considering attaching .wav files of the voicemail left on our helpdesk to rt tickets, but I'm worried about performance/stability if I start putting this amount of binary data in the system. I ran this thought by our local DB guy and he suggested that this might not be a problem if the

Re: [rt-users] Attachment storage

2009-07-29 Thread Jerrad Pierce
1) Do I have it right that the attachments are stored in the DB itself? Alas, they are. 2) If they are, could the DB handle, say, a thousand 200KB-2MB attachments per year (and if so for how long?)? Depends on your rdbms. Oracle could it, not so sure about MySQL. Alternatively, you could

Re: [rt-users] Attachment storage

2009-07-29 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Wed 29.Jul'09 at 18:16:51 -0500, Michael Ellis wrote: So I suppose I have three questions: 1) Do I have it right that the attachments are stored in the DB itself? Yes. 2) If they are, could the DB handle, say, a thousand 200KB-2MB attachments per year (and if so for how long?)? 2