Re: [rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug

2012-01-06 Thread mjames
...@lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Falcone Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 12:58 PM To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:24:02AM -0500, mja...@guesswho.com

Re: [rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug

2012-01-06 Thread Thomas Sibley
On 01/06/2012 12:35 PM, mja...@guesswho.com wrote: OK, this seems to be a relevant portion of the log file. Sorry about the delay in replying. -Mike [Thu Dec 15 19:38:48 2011] [warning]: DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Got a packet bigger than 'max_allowed_packet' bytes at

Re: [rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug

2012-01-06 Thread mjames
for the explanation. Mike -Original Message- From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Thomas Sibley Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 12:51 PM To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment

Re: [rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug

2012-01-06 Thread Alex Vandiver
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 16:11 -0500, mja...@guesswho.com wrote: The user had tried to submit a mysqldump that was 20GB as an attachment I'm surprised your mail server didn't fall over from that. But I didn't expect RT to increment the id when ticket creation failed. For reference, RT isn't the

Re: [rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug

2012-01-06 Thread mjames
...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Alex Vandiver Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 4:21 PM To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: Re: [rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 16:11 -0500, mja...@guesswho.com wrote: The user had tried to submit a mysqldump that was 20GB

Re: [rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug

2012-01-05 Thread mjames
size limit. Mike From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of mja...@guesswho.com Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 8:24 AM To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com Subject: [rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug This may be a bug

Re: [rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug

2011-12-19 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:24:02AM -0500, mja...@guesswho.com wrote: This may be a bug in the way attachments are handled in 4.0.4. We recently spun up a new instance of RT 4.0.2, then upgraded to 4.0.4. Running on Centos 5.7 using MySQL. Yesterday we were at ticket #53. A user

[rt-users] possible RT 4.0.4 attachment bug

2011-12-16 Thread mjames
This may be a bug in the way attachments are handled in 4.0.4. We recently spun up a new instance of RT 4.0.2, then upgraded to 4.0.4. Running on Centos 5.7 using MySQL. Yesterday we were at ticket #53. A user sent an email last night with an attachment containing sql statements (a database