Hi ,
Hope you are doing great!!...
We have an urgent below *“Software Test Engineer”* position with one of our
client for *“6-12months” *at *“Cambridge, MA”. *Please send me the resumes
with full name, contact details, Rate, and availability date.
* Job Description:*
Job Title : Soft
From: Stephen Barber
The EC can function as a simple RT, this patch adds the RTC related
definitions needed by the rtc-cros-ec driver.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Barber
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra
---
include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
di
From: Stephen Barber
On platforms with a Chrome OS EC, the EC can function as a simple RTC.
Add a basic driver with this functionality.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Barber
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra
---
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 10 ++
drivers/rtc/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/rtc/rt
From: Stephen Barber
If the EC supports RTC host commands, expose an RTC device.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Barber
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra
---
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_dev.c | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/chrome/cr
From: Gwendal Grignou
Add cros_ec_get_event() entry point to retrieve event within functions
called by the notifier.
Signed-off-by: Gwendal Grignou
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra
---
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c | 20
include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
The function is too complicated for gcc to realize that this variable
does eventually get initialized, causing a harmless warning:
drivers/rtc/rtc-armada38x.c: In function 'read_rtc_register_wa':
drivers/rtc/rtc-armada38x.c:131:25: warning: 'index_max' may be used
uninitialized in this function [
This patch adds support for the STM32 RTC.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay
---
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/rtc/Makefile| 1 +
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 727
3 files changed, 739 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/rtc/rtc-s
Hi Corentin,
Thanks for reviewing,
On 01/11/2017 02:04 PM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 01:48:25PM +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
This patch adds support for the STM32 RTC.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay
---
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/rtc/Makefile| 1 +
d
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 01:48:25PM +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> This patch adds support for the STM32 RTC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay
> ---
> drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 11 +
> drivers/rtc/Makefile| 1 +
> drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 727
>
This patch adds support for the STM32 RTC.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay
---
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/rtc/Makefile| 1 +
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 727
3 files changed, 739 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/rtc/rtc-s
On 11/01/2017 at 10:16:58 +, Russell King wrote :
> Armada38x wants to modify its rtc_class_ops to remove the interrupt
> handling when there is no usable interrupt, but this means we leave
> function pointers in writable memory.
>
> Since rtc_class_ops is small, arrange to have two instances,
On 11/01/2017 at 11:42:50 +0100, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote :
>
> On 01/11/2017 11:17 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 11/01/2017 at 11:07:16 +0100, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote :
> > > > This will never happen, tm is already checked multiple times (up to
> > > > three) in the core before this function can
On 01/11/2017 11:17 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 11/01/2017 at 11:07:16 +0100, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote :
This will never happen, tm is already checked multiple times (up to
three) in the core before this function can be called.
You're right. I'll remove all rtc_valid_tm calls.
You can keep
Armada38x wants to modify its rtc_class_ops to remove the interrupt
handling when there is no usable interrupt, but this means we leave
function pointers in writable memory.
Since rtc_class_ops is small, arrange to have two instances, one for
when we have interrupts, and one for when we have none,
On 11/01/2017 at 11:07:16 +0100, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote :
> > This will never happen, tm is already checked multiple times (up to
> > three) in the core before this function can be called.
> >
> You're right. I'll remove all rtc_valid_tm calls.
You can keep the one in read_time
--
Alexandre Bell
Hi Alexandre,
On 01/11/2017 01:08 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Looks good to me, however...
On 05/01/2017 at 14:43:24 +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote :
+struct stm32_rtc {
+ struct rtc_device *rtc_dev;
+ void __iomem *base;
+ struct clk *ck_rtc;
+ spinlock_t lock; /* Prot
16 matches
Mail list logo
