On 05/23/14 01:08, Alan Cudmore wrote:
Hi Andre,
Please see my comments below:
Alan
On 5/22/2014 6:30 PM, Andre Marques wrote:
Hello,
I will start my GSOC project with a GPIO driver for the RPi BSP, and
part of the GPIO driver code will not be specific to the RPi but to
any board with a
On 05/23/14 17:57, Chris Nott wrote:
My two cents:
On 22/05/2014 3:30 PM, Andre Marques wrote:
Hello,
I will start my GSOC project with a GPIO driver for the RPi BSP, and
part of the GPIO driver code will not be specific to the RPi but to
any board with a GPIO interface. With code reuse in
(int gpio)
rtems_gpio_read_value (int gpio)
And interrupt management:
rtems_int_enable (int gpio, rtems_interrupt_level int)
rtems_int_disable (int gpio)
rtems_int_clear (int gpio)
Would appreciate some feedback on this.
--Andre Marques.
___
rtems-devel mailing list
r
On 05/09/14 03:24, Alan Cudmore wrote:
I have not had much time to figure out why GDB is not working with the
Pi/openOCD setup yet.
But I started documenting my setup. The hardware details are here:
http://alanstechnotes.blogspot.com/2014/05/a-low-cost-jtag-debugger-for-raspberry.html
Next I w
On 05/09/14 07:04, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-05-08 18:51, Andre Marques wrote:
On 05/05/14 11:50, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-05-05 12:43, Andre Marques wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
Why not use C11 atomic operations?
Well, I didn't know they existed, thank you!
Since I hav
t
reads the first two partition blocks and then hangs.
If you get stuck share your sources and let me know.
Will try to get the code to github soon.
2014-05-13 14:03 GMT+04:00 Andre Marques
mailto:andre.lousa.marq...@gmail.com>>:
On 05/12/14 19:25, Andrey Mozzhuhin wrote:
On 05/13/14 17:43, Ric Claus wrote:
I did this same kind of thing almost a year ago (for a Zynq project), but
starting from the U-Boot sources. (I understand there are licensing issues
that prevent it from being included in RTEMS.) In the process of debugging it,
I found that one pattern tha
specs/archive/part1_301.pdf
Host Controller Simplified Specification (2.00) -
https://www.sdcard.org/downloads/pls/simplified_specs/archive/partA2_200.pdf
and the raspberry soc datasheet: Broadcom BCM2835 Peripherals Guide
(Chapter 5 - EMMC)
2014-05-12 20:23 GMT+04:00 Andre Ma
1) format partition under RTEMS with msdos_format() function;
2) check that PC can read/write this SD Card;
3) if PC fails to mount this partition - dump SD Card and check
that all data is on right sectors.
2014-05-05 13:52 GMT+04:00 Andre Marques
mailto:andre.lousa.marq...@
On 05/05/14 11:50, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-05-05 12:43, Andre Marques wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
Why not use C11 atomic operations?
Well, I didn't know they existed, thank you!
Since I have not used them before, please check if I'm thinking this right.
1. Include r
Hello,
I have updated the blog [1] last week with some info on memory barriers
for the ARM achitecture.
As for the RPi BSP, the needed inline assembly may be implemented in
three ways:
1. Any explicit memory access is done through a function, which wraps
the memory access instruction with
Hello,
Following the problem in
http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-devel/2014-April/006585.html
I am now trying to mount the SD card partitions on RTEMS.
Summarizing the process:
1. rtems_io_register_driver (by calling my driver with
CONFIGURE_APPLICATION_EXTRA_DRIVERS on hello sample)
2
h the configuration in
your code.
I have configured the base filesystem to IMFS (as used in the
fstests/fsbdpart01) instead of the devfs used on samples/hello and it
compiles now.
Thanks for the help.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Andre Marques
mailto:andre.lousa.marq...@gmai
Hello,
I am currently working on an emmc driver for the Raspberry Pi, and I am
trying to mount the SD card using libblock on RTEMS GIT HEAD.
To mount the SD card I am doing:
1. rtems_io_register_driver (by calling my driver with
CONFIGURE_APPLICATION_EXTRA_DRIVERS on hello sample)
2. rtems
Hello,
On 04/26/14 17:00, Hesham Moustafa wrote:
Hi all,
I wanna create a Wiki page for my project, but I see no clear
instructions for dealing with the website. Please provide me with any
links and/or templates that may help.
On the Open Projects page:
http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/Op
I'm taking this conversation to the list.
On 04/23/14 01:21, Alan Cudmore wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Andre Marques
mailto:andre.lousa.marq...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
Hello,
I am very pleased to have the opportunity to participate in GSoC
with the RT
On 04/17/14 19:21, Alan Cudmore wrote:
On 4/17/2014 5:42 AM, Andre Marques wrote:
On 04/17/14 03:22, Alan Cudmore wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Joel Sherrill
mailto:joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com>> wrote:
On 4/16/2014 2:06 PM, Alan Cudmore wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 201
On 04/17/14 03:22, Alan Cudmore wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Joel Sherrill
mailto:joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com>> wrote:
On 4/16/2014 2:06 PM, Alan Cudmore wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Andre Marques
mailto:andre.lousa.marq...@gmail.com>> wrote:
possibility, using a TFTP server.
Alan
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Andre Marques
wrote:
Hello,
I'm intending to work in the SD card support for the Raspberry Pi BSP,
using the SD mode instead of the SPI mode.
The references I have gathered so far for this are as follows:
T
Hello,
I'm intending to work in the SD card support for the Raspberry Pi BSP,
using the SD mode instead of the SPI mode.
The references I have gathered so far for this are as follows:
The Raspberry Pi SOC guide: Broadcom BCM2835 Peripherals Guide (Chapter
5 - EMMC)
The simplified SD standa
Hello,
The previous discussion topic title wasn't in sync with the conversation
anymore
http://www.rtems.org/pipermail/rtems-devel/2014-March/005821.html
so I'm creating this one.
I have been searching for some info on this beyond bugzilla without much
luck
https://www.rtems.org/bugzilla/
On 03/10/14 07:37, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-03-09 18:51, Andre Marques wrote:
The problem is everything in the SMP task list seems to be already
under way.
Maybe it would be better for me to focus outside SMP for GSoC.
For POSIX I could:
- Continue rename() test case (including the
Asynchronous_IO)
- Test POSIX FIFOS (http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/POSIXFIFOs)
- Solve some issues with newlib
(http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/POSIX_Methods_in_NewLib_RTEMS_improvements)
What do you think?
--Andre Marques.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Andre Marques
wrote:
other entities.
Thank you for your time.
--Andre Marques.
On 03/04/14 16:41, Andre Marques wrote:
Thanks for the responses.
What about thread processor affinity?
http://www.rtems.org/wiki/index.php/SMP#Processor_Affinity
I have seen Sebastian's opinion about it at
http://www.rtems.org/p
14:16, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
On 2014-03-01 01:13, Andre Marques wrote:
Hello,
As stated in [1] I will be working with RTEMS for my undergraduate thesis,
but
I'm also looking to work with RTEMS through GSOC.
For the last month I have be
Hello,
As stated in [1] I will be working with RTEMS for my undergraduate
thesis, but I'm also looking to work with RTEMS through GSOC.
For the last month I have been working on a test case to check rename()
POSIX compliance. For GSOC, however, I would like to work on a SMP-aware
scheduler,
so this is postponed for now)
Any problem with the patch please let me know.
--André Marques
>From 01bd91abd04f5f9c24e20254eedbe4eacadae62c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andre Marques
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:15:06 +
Subject: [PATCH] New fstest to check rename POSIX conformance
--
On 02/21/14 13:43, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-02-21 14:38, Andre Marques wrote:
I tried to create a ramdisk as in
http://www.rtems.org/onlinedocs/doxygen/cpukit/html/group__rtems__ramdisk.html#gac6c99eed9f3b92bb4cf5184b25972e65
but the program exits during the rtems_blkdev_create
On 02/21/14 08:12, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-02-20 00:36, Andre Marques wrote:
- Testing errno values in error situations. There is already a
fstest named
fserror which purpose seems to be checking errno values for a
bunch of
functions (rename included, but with some errno values
On 02/19/14 14:00, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-02-19 11:27, Andre Marques wrote:
Sorry for the delay.
I'm almost ready to send the patch with the test, but there are some
questions.
This is nice.
On 02/10/14 08:14, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Andre,
thanks for the test case
Sorry for the delay.
I'm almost ready to send the patch with the test, but there are some
questions.
On 02/10/14 08:14, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello Andre,
thanks for the test case.
On 2014-02-08 13:26, Andre Marques wrote:
Hi,
As discussed in [1], I created a new fstest to chec
On 02/11/14 01:07, Nick Withers wrote:
On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 12:26 +, Andre Marques wrote:
Hi,
As discussed in [1], I created a new fstest to check the rename()
implementation against the POSIX specification [2].
What the attached patch does not test:
- Testing the existance of a link
ques
>From fe91c9c1072112c5d191a231da0ef4c04159dce6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andre Marques
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 11:40:49 +
Subject: [PATCH] New fstest to check rename POSIX conformance
---
testsuites/fstests/Makefile.am | 1 +
testsuites/fstests/configure.ac| 1 +
tests
33 matches
Mail list logo
