Hello,
Whether I try to use llimd with a negative number as first argument, I got a crash (or
an
arithmetic exception if I use the function in a normal linux process).
The following call crash : llimd ( -25 000 000,400 000 000, 1000 000)
But the following seems OK : llimd ( 25 000 000,400 0
2001 05:51:13 PM
To: "'Christos Tranoris'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Hello,
I discovered something strange with the FIFOs (RTAI-1.5). I wrote a small RT task that
basically put a character to a FIFO, do a few thing (print a message in the log file
and do a few computation). and then read the FIFO again. This is the only RT task in
the system. So normally, you
Hello,
I've found a nicely "undocumented feature", in the semaphore package. I discovered
that when you initialise a semaphore with a zero count. Although everything seems to
wors fine. this means any process that do a rt_sem_wait actually wait until another
task
make a rt_sem_signal, you h
tween high_memory and memory_end, that would be interresting ...).
- I initialize the VME Bridge
- Then do a simple write access to memory.
The "funny" part of it is that I could access the whole memory over the VME bus
Laurent Kersten
ABSp.
is enough) doesn't
work anymore.
I had a quick look in the kernel source code (init/main.c) and I can't find my
"mem="kernel paramater. Is that disappeared ? And if yes, how can I find back my old
trick ?
Thanks
Laurent Kersten
ABSp.
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo &
the problem.
I posted it a few days ago to the linux-kernel mailing list. The people there were
unable to reproduce the problem and thus I conclude that this might due to the RTAI
patch appliance.
Any clues ?
Best regards
Laurent Kersten
Alcatel Bell Space N.V.
Berkenrodelei 33
B-2660 Hobo
Hello,
I'm trying to compile a small program I write (actually part of iit). Unfortunately
there are memcpy (and also strcpy) call in my code. I though that GCC convert them to
builtins and so no call are made. And it seems to work ... on some filesonly ...
I'm using GCC version egcs 2.91.66
