You can use netcat (zippy.telcom.arizona.edu:/pub/mirrors/avian.org/hacks/nc110.tgz)
nc -l -p 5000 /dev/rtf10
(gdb) target remote host:5000
Michael.
Stuart Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> As an aside, does anyone know of a way to open a socket and link it to a
> file?
> ie something like
>
ric Peterson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 6:58 PM
> > To: Stephen D. Cohen
> > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: Re: [rtl] Using RTFifos with multiple writers?
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:37:29AM -0500, Stephen
hen D. Cohen
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [rtl] Using RTFifos with multiple writers?
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:37:29AM -0500, Stephen D. Cohen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > David Olofson offered an excellent treatise on why multiple open of
Eric Peterson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:37:29AM -0500, Stephen D. Cohen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > David Olofson offered an excellent treatise on why multiple open of a
> > FIFO is a bad idea. I would like to offer a fairly simple solution.
> >
> > Simply create a block o
I had a similar problem but in reverse - I needed multiple readers on
the one fifo. The easiest solution was to have a user space program
read the fifo and then store the data in a separate queue for each
reader. Readers connect via tcp/ip. Doing the same for fifo writes
from user space would b
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:37:29AM -0500, Stephen D. Cohen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Olofson offered an excellent treatise on why multiple open of a
> FIFO is a bad idea. I would like to offer a fairly simple solution.
>
> Simply create a block of FIFOs on the RTL side of the hou
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:15:14PM +0100, David Olofson wrote:
> Thu, 14 Dec 2000 Eric Peterson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to use RT-Linux (2.2) RT-FIFOs, and I have come up against
> > an apparent limitation with them: they only allow one writer (on the
> > Linux side) to
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 Stephen D. Cohen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> David Olofson offered an excellent treatise on why multiple open of
> a FIFO is a bad idea. I would like to offer a fairly simple solution.
>
> Simply create a block of FIFOs on the RTL side of the house. Attach
> them all to the s
Hi,
David Olofson offered an excellent treatise on why multiple open of
a FIFO is a bad idea. I would like to offer a fairly simple solution.
Simply create a block of FIFOs on the RTL side of the house. Attach
them all to the same handler (it gets the FIFO number when it is cal
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 Eric Peterson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use RT-Linux (2.2) RT-FIFOs, and I have come up against an
> apparent limitation with them: they only allow one writer (on the Linux
> side) to open the FIFO. I would like multiple processes to be able to
> open (a
10 matches
Mail list logo
