Re: asciidoctor-diagram missing from Fedora

2020-11-02 Thread Neal Gompa
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 10:41 AM Christopher Brown wrote: > > Hi Dan, > > Thanks for this. The issue I think is that there is a large number of > dependencies and AIUI, Fedora doesn't allow these to be bundled with the > gem[1]. This means a fairly significant task creating packages for a variety

Re: asciidoctor-diagram missing from Fedora

2020-11-02 Thread Dan Allen
Christopher, I understand your point. But please consider the fact that many of the diagramming tool integrations that Asciidoctor Diagram provides are optional (and thus there is no reason to bundle them). If the tool is not there, then it simply cannot be used in the document. The "core" ones ar

Re: asciidoctor-diagram missing from Fedora

2020-11-02 Thread Vít Ondruch
Unfortunately, there is not right or wrong format. It is just about critical mass. If you create flatpak/snap instead, you won't benefit from fixes possibly provided by other packagers. While if there is not enough packagers, it is certainly annoying to be the one to take care about everything.

Re: asciidoctor-diagram missing from Fedora

2020-11-02 Thread Christopher Brown
Hi Dan, Thanks for this. The issue I think is that there is a large number of dependencies and AIUI, Fedora doesn't allow these to be bundled with the gem[1]. This means a fairly significant task creating packages for a variety of nodejs dependencies amongst other things, e.g. Vega[2] has a fairly