Dne 20. 11. 20 v 17:02 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 10:51:46 AM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
What if we provided `%{ruby_vendorlibdir}/rbconfig.rb`, which would fix
the `CXX` as well as the rhbz#1284684? WDYT?
I'm not entirely sure how that'd
Dne 20. 11. 20 v 16:21 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 20. 11. 20 v 15:07 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Another ~2 weeks passed, so here is yet another updated Ruby 3.0
snapshot. The changes are available here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/70
And the build is running
- Original Message -
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2020 10:51:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
>
> What if we provided `%{ruby_vendorlibdir}/rbconfig.rb`, which would fix
> the `CXX` as well as the rhbz#1284684? WDYT?
I'm not entirely sure how that'd work TBH.
Would it override the original
Dne 20. 11. 20 v 15:07 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Another ~2 weeks passed, so here is yet another updated Ruby 3.0
snapshot. The changes are available here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/70
And the build is running here:
Hi,
Another ~2 weeks passed, so here is yet another updated Ruby 3.0
snapshot. The changes are available here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/70
And the build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=55942586
I have not noticed anything
Dne 19. 11. 20 v 18:22 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 19. 11. 20 v 16:52 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
This kind of commits does not make me happy :( While the intention is
good, they don't take into consideration any distribution. It is
tailored to the old fashion way of "download tarball & configure &
What if we provided `%{ruby_vendorlibdir}/rbconfig.rb`, which would fix
the `CXX` as well as the rhbz#1284684? WDYT?
Vít
Dne 20. 11. 20 v 1:59 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2020
