On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Rainer Frey frey.rai...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately the Rails Guide on Active Record Validation and
Callbacks says (Section 3.9):
If you want to be sure that an association is present, you’ll need to
test whether the foreign key used to map the association
Hey Alex, if you want go ahead and try a fix ;).
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Alex alexander.uva...@gmail.com wrote:
In my attempt to add AM:Dirty to my model I realized that
AM#AttributeMethods is a bit imperfect. It's impossible to generate
attribute methods step-by-step in
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Xavier Noria f...@hashref.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Rainer Frey frey.rai...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately the Rails Guide on Active Record Validation and
Callbacks says (Section 3.9):
If you want to be sure that an association is present,
Since I got no answer from rails_upgrade, I can help with any project.
Anyone willing to share management, please talk to me.
Everton
On Feb 4, 2:31 pm, Anuj Dutta dutta.a...@googlemail.com wrote:
As advised by Santiago here's my preference:
open_id_authentication
asset_server
Thanks.
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:28 +0100, Rainer Frey wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Xavier Noria f...@hashref.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Rainer Frey frey.rai...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately the Rails Guide on Active Record Validation and
Callbacks says (Section 3.9):
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Rainer Frey frey.rai...@gmail.com wrote:
But this thread seems to suggest one should simply validate the
association attribute instead. Is that not sufficient then?
You can't still be sure the association is valid, because the
associated object is cached if
I'd be glad to help as I've already created (with other people)
ActiveValidators https://github.com/cesario/activevalidators.
FYI Iain, the email validation is based on the mail gem.
Franck
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Ryan Bigg radarliste...@gmail.com wrote:
I think making this a gem
Hey,
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 15:22 +0100, Xavier Noria wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Rainer Frey frey.rai...@gmail.com wrote:
But this thread seems to suggest one should simply validate the
association attribute instead. Is that not sufficient then?
You can't still be sure the
@Darian Shimy: Thanks for adding me as collaborator for the
http_authentication plugin.
On 5 feb, 01:17, Darian Shimy dsh...@gmail.com wrote:
@Lars Smit: No problem, I added you as a collaborator.
--
Darian Shimy
On Feb 4, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Lars Smit wrote:
I see that John Dewey and
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:32:02PM +1100, Ryan Bigg wrote:
I think making this a gem first would be a good start, and once its garnered
major support then it will be merged into core. Not all applications have to
validate email and URLs (although, a large majority do, I will concede)
I agree
I must say I agree. A good, stable and full featured gem is what's needed.
The only downside to this is that newcomers to the framework won't know it
and thus have to re-implement the wheel again and again, at least in their
first steps. Could the gem be officially supported, possibly with a
11 matches
Mail list logo
