[Rails-core] Official support for ActiveSupport::Duration w/o core extensions

2015-03-21 Thread Steve Jorgensen
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask about this, so my apologies if it is not. I am interested in writing a Gem that takes advantage of ActiveSupport durations, but I don't want to require using core extensions in order to use my gem. I notice that there is a ActiveSupport::Duration

Re: [Rails-core] Official support for ActiveSupport::Duration w/o core extensions

2015-03-21 Thread Nicolás Sanguinetti
By requiring active_support/duration you’re already forcing core extensions on your users. Take a look at https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/activesupport/lib/active_support/duration.rb#L1-L2 (And if you look at those files, they in turn require even more things from core_ext).

[Rails-core] rails generate model Attribute Type Enforcement

2015-03-21 Thread Harry Grillo
I noticed today, when I mistyped the keyword references as reference that rails g model doesn't enforce the types of attributes added to a model, so when the migration is run, an error occurs. Is there a reason this isn't enforced? Since generate model creates a migration by default, it would

Re: [Rails-core] Official support for ActiveSupport::Duration w/o core extensions

2015-03-21 Thread Steve Jorgensen
Thanks for pointing that out. My question is apparently moot, then. Is there any desire to see ActiveSupport refactored such that more of its functionality is available without having to use core extensions? On Saturday, March 21, 2015 at 2:00:12 PM UTC-7, Nicolás Sanguinetti wrote: By

[Rails-core] Stripping _id in titleize

2015-03-21 Thread Nicholas Firth-McCoy
Related: https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/17985 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Ruby on Rails: Core group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-core+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post