Re: [Rails-core] Re: New rubyonrails.org website?

luwwy5foJ > > > Den fredag den 5. juni 2015 kl. 21.59.14 UTC+2 skrev Frank Tellefsen: >> >> Hi! >> >> Anybody know if there are plans to create a new Ruby on Rails website? >> One that's, say, more similar to RailsGuides or Ruby's website? >> >

[Rails-core] New rubyonrails.org website?

Hi! Anybody know if there are plans to create a new Ruby on Rails website? One that's, say, more similar to RailsGuides or Ruby's website? How do you guys feel about the current website? Many thanks! Frank -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

Re: [Rails-core] Redesign the Rubyonrails.org

* less like BaseCamp 2014-12-23 13:37 GMT+01:00 Frank Tellefsen : > Hi! > > > Please elaborate. > > > > Where do you think the site is lacking? How can we improve it? > > Maybe make it more like http://ruby-lang.org/ and less BaseCamp? Ie. a > simpler, more tr

Re: [Rails-core] Redesign the Rubyonrails.org

Hi! > Please elaborate. > > Where do you think the site is lacking? How can we improve it? Maybe make it more like http://ruby-lang.org/ and less BaseCamp? Ie. a simpler, more traditional structure, with all the latest news right there on the front page. Thanks! Frank P.S. An announce mailingl

Re: [Rails-core] Changing welcome#index page in the new Rails applications

Given that Rails isn't a front-end lib, maybe we could just go with something like http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/? Thanks! Frank 2014-11-27 19:12 GMT+01:00 richard schneeman : > :+1: I can dig it. > > How about adding a link to the routing page while we're at it. > > -- > Richard Schneeman >

Re: [Rails-core] Feature idea: nicer scaffolded views

I am all for grids as a tool in graphic design and architecture ( http://www.slideshare.net/huer1278ft/grids-are-good-right), but why some people see the need to transfer them programatically onto their HTML and CSS is beyond me. I would actually argue that the look of scaffolding should be made e

Re: [Rails-core] Re: HTML minification

t; one: https://github.com/paolochiodi/htmlcompressor > > On Friday, August 8, 2014 9:05:23 PM UTC-3, Frank Tellefsen wrote: >> >> Based on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8098317 (HTML minifier >> revisited) and specifically: >> >> Google minifies HTML on basical

[Rails-core] HTML minification

Based on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8098317 (HTML minifier revisited) and specifically: Google minifies HTML on basically all its properties. It's probably about a > 50% savings in bytes, which translates to (on my Comcast connection) about > 250ms in network latency saved. Multiply out

[Rails-core] HTML minification

Based on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8098317 (HTML minifier revisited) and specifically: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8099192 -- is there a way to make Rails render partials on the same line in the DOM? I'd like to combine this with a Rake task that copies views to a temp folder,

Re: [Rails-core] Replace Sprockets with Half Pipe

2014-06-10 0:36 GMT+02:00 Ryan Bigg : > Why would the community do that? What are the benefits? Why is Sprockets bad? I'm no expert, but what I like about it is: - Direct JS libs management via `bower.json`, no more http://rails-assets.org/ middleman - Better concatenation and minification via

[Rails-core] Replace Sprockets with Half Pipe

Hi, Is there any chance of one day replacing Sprockets with Half Pipe? - https://github.com/d-i/half-pipe/ - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gaZsFkZ2BQ It looks like such a great project but seems to be lacking the resources to bring it to its prime. Thanks! Frank -- You received t