Attached is my proposed patch for the translation issue. I think we should
support both conventions and deprecate neither. The newer convention is
cleaner when you nest multiple models within one namespace:
en:
activemodel:
models:
namespace:
model_one:
one: Model One
other: Model Ones
mod
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Aaron Patterson wrote:
> + def
> test_translated_model_attributes_with_attribute_matching_namespaced_model_name_and_dot
> +assert_deprecated do
> + I18n.backend.store_translations 'en', :activemodel => {:attributes
> => {:person => {:gender => 'person g
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:18:45AM -0700, John Firebaugh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas > wrote:
>
> > This issue started here:
> >
> >
> > https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3768-patch-add-full_message-option-to-validations#ticket-3768-69
>
On Mar 30, 2011, at 7:18 PM, Aaron Patterson wrote:
> I'll be on vacation. :-D
Fixed that for you. :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:18:45AM -0700, John Firebaugh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas > wrote:
>
> > This issue started here:
> >
> >
> > https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3768-patch-add-full_message-option-to-validations#ticket-3768-69
>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Robert Pankowecki wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Aaron Patterson
> wrote:
> >> As you can see the simple expectation that yesterday = today -1 and
> >> tomorrow = today + 1 is apparently not true in some cases. This
> >> problem probably happens
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Aaron Patterson
wrote:
>> As you can see the simple expectation that yesterday = today -1 and
>> tomorrow = today + 1 is apparently not true in some cases. This
>> problem probably happens around midnight in some zones...
>>
>> Do you want me to create tickets for
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Aaron Patterson
wrote:
> I agree we should support both for now, and deprecate one. I'll come
> up with a test and fix, and we'll release a new RC.
Or we could add a setting which version you prefer.
> Thanks for reporting this!
Thanks for RC release and the a
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:23:55AM +0200, Robert Pankowecki wrote:
> I also found a bug that occurs on 3.0.5
>
> ruby-1.9.2-p136 :004 > Time.now
> => 2011-03-30 01:15:20 +0200
> ruby-1.9.2-p136 :005 > Date.today
> => Wed, 30 Mar 2011
> ruby-1.9.2-p136 :006 > Date.yesterday
> => Mon, 28 Mar 2011
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:18:45AM -0700, John Firebaugh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas > wrote:
>
> > This issue started here:
> >
> >
> > https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3768-patch-add-full_message-option-to-validations#ticket-3768-69
>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> This issue started here:
>
>
> https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3768-patch-add-full_message-option-to-validations#ticket-3768-69
>
> Then José Valim thought it was a bug and asked me to create another issue:
>
This issue started here:
https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/3768-patch-add-full_message-option-to-validations#ticket-3768-69
Then José Valim thought it was a bug and asked me to create another issue:
https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/5572
Then, this issu
I meant
class Articles
module Articles
class Articles::Category
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyon
I thank that because this bug has been around since 3.0.2 version:
https://rails.lighthouseapp.com/projects/8994/tickets/6034-human_attribute_name-scopes-translations-differently-for-nested-classes-since-rails-302
lot of people assumed that using '.' instead of '/' is the new way of
doing things in
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Robert Pankowecki <
robert.pankowe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Ryan Bigg
> wrote:
> > We are asking you (yes you!) to *try out* the release candidate. If
> > something
> > that changed between 3.0.5 and this release candidate breaks yo
I also found a bug that occurs on 3.0.5
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :004 > Time.now
=> 2011-03-30 01:15:20 +0200
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :005 > Date.today
=> Wed, 30 Mar 2011
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :006 > Date.yesterday
=> Mon, 28 Mar 2011
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :007 > Time.zone
=> (GMT+00:00) UTC
ruby-1.9.2-p136 :008 > Date.t
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:30 PM, Ryan Bigg wrote:
> We are asking you (yes you!) to *try out* the release candidate. If
> something
> that changed between 3.0.5 and this release candidate breaks your
> application,
> we want to know about it!
ActiveModel::Name does not have :i18n_key method anym
You should run `bundle update` rather than `bundle install`, because `bundle
update` ignores & updates the Gemfile.lock file, whereas `bundle install`
doesn't.
--
Ryan Bigg
On Wednesday, 30 March 2011 at 8:06 AM, Aaron Patterson wrote:
> ZOMG HAPPY TUESDAY (UTC-7)!!! <3<3<3<3<3
>
> I am happ
ZOMG HAPPY TUESDAY (UTC-7)!!! <3<3<3<3<3
I am happy to announce that the first release candidate for Rails 3.0.6 has
been pushed to rubygems.org.
## Release Candidate: What does it mean?
The release candidate is very similar to what we will actually release for
version 3.0.6. The reason that w
19 matches
Mail list logo
