Yes. I have given bad example. It should be only:
has_may :boos, class_name: 'Foo'
I was writing fast as I encounter the problem, so don't be mad.
W dni czw 1 maj, 2014 o 23∶31 użytkownik Matt Jones
napisał:
On May 1, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Łukasz Niemier
wrote:
It will be nice, if has_* m
On May 1, 2014, at 11:57 AM, Łukasz Niemier wrote:
> It will be nice, if has_* methods will have named option. Example:
>
> has_many :foos, named: :boos
>
> # equivalent of
>
> has_many :boos, class_name: 'Foo', foreign_key: 'foo_id'
>
> IMHO it is quite often used feature. Also it will be n
I also think it is used pretty frequent and may be a good convention. +1 on
this, i personally will be glad to see this on trunk.
2014-05-01 19:57 GMT+04:00 Łukasz Niemier :
> It will be nice, if has_* methods will have named option. Example:
>
> has_many :foos, named: :boos
>
> # equivalent of
It will be nice, if has_* methods will have named option. Example:
has_many :foos, named: :boos
# equivalent of
has_many :boos, class_name: 'Foo', foreign_key: 'foo_id'
IMHO it is quite often used feature. Also it will be nice to have scoped option
that will allow easy flow with scoped models