[Rails] Re: calling methods from one object in another?

2011-04-17 Thread Nathan Domier
Aha! I've figured it out. In case anyone else is wondering, I have a current_user defined in sessions helper, so, I had to include sessionshelper, and set @user = current_user! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro

[Rails] Re: calling methods from one object in another?

2011-04-17 Thread Nathan Domier
I wanted to pass it the id of the logged in user. I have some things that I want to show up for some users and not for others. I wanted to use @user.admin? for this, which works fine on the users pages. however, since I can't get the @user assignment to work for pages this isn't working eithe

[Rails] calling methods from one object in another?

2011-04-16 Thread Nathan Domier
I realize the title probably doesn't make much sense, but that was the best short description I could come up with. Anyway, I have users and pages in my site, and was using the following code in the users controller, which works fine: def show @user = User.find(params[:id]) @title = @u

[Rails] Re: Site displays as code?

2010-11-04 Thread Nathan Domier
Rajinder Yadav wrote in post #959273: > On 10-11-02 04:00 AM, Nathan Domier wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm completely new to ruby and working my way through the tutorial on >> http://www.tutorialspoint.com/ruby-on-rails-2.1/ >> > > don't waste your time

[Rails] Re: Re: Site displays as code?

2010-11-04 Thread Nathan Domier
Lunks wrote in post #958901: > You should not install rails from the Ubuntu repository. It is usually > an > older version. Just install ruby, install rubygems, then do a gem > install > rails. It should be on 3.0. > > Also, you most surely doesn't need Apache to try it out. Once everything > is >

[Rails] Re: Site displays as code?

2010-11-02 Thread Nathan Domier
ok, I'm completely frustrated with the install process for gems and rails \. apt-get install rubygems1.9.1 seems to work, but when I try to run gem, it says it's not installed. To get gem to work, I have to apt-get ruby, which installs 1.8, instead of 1.9, yet enables the gem command. Then, g

[Rails] Re: Re: Site displays as code?

2010-11-02 Thread Nathan Domier
> Could you not top post please, and remember to quote the email you are > replying to, otherwise it is difficult to follow the thread Sorry, what is top posting? > If you want to move to rails 3 I would suggest forgetting about that > app and starting again with rails 3. Alright, the app was ju

[Rails] Re: Site displays as code?

2010-11-02 Thread Nathan Domier
> Then please use a 2.3 tutorial. You'll only get frustrated if you try > to use a 2.1 tutorial with Rails 2.3. I'd like to use rails 3 if that's the most recent, I'm just trying to get everything set up at the moment anyway. >From your description, I'd be looking first at your webserver (Apach

[Rails] Re: Site displays as code?

2010-11-02 Thread Nathan Domier
Interesting, rails -v gave me 2.3.5, so I tried running 'gem update rails' which gave me 'Nothing to update' Then I tried 'gem install rails' which put several folders into /var/lib/gems/1.8/gems/ including a "rails-3.0.1" folder, get rails -v still gives me 2.3.5 and gem update rails still giv

[Rails] Site displays as code?

2010-11-02 Thread Nathan Domier
Hi, I'm completely new to ruby and working my way through the tutorial on http://www.tutorialspoint.com/ruby-on-rails-2.1/ I've made a few pages to use, but when I open them in a web browser all I see is code. For instance, my new.html.erb, the code of which is: - Add n