@Rogerio: This way the scopes are merged with AND not OR
@Jeremy: I've read README and I haven't found a way to join scopes with OR,
as you mentioned. The only way I found is to join attributes with OR, not
scopes. I've tried that hack (where_clauses.join('OR')) before too. The
problem is that,
Hi Gustavo
Coincidentally, I was recently doing something similar. Older versions of
rails used to evaluate my previous solution using | to an
ActiveRelation. When this stopped I dont know, or maybe I am just mistaken.
In any case, I finally settled on using the squeel
U try ?
escopo: find_visibles, lambda { find_in_coverage|find_know_
missing}
2012/5/22 azizmb.in m...@azizmb.in
Hi Gustavo
Coincidentally, I was recently doing something similar. Older versions of
rails used to evaluate my previous solution using | to an
ActiveRelation. When this
The problem of the first solution is that find_in_coverage |
find_known_missing combined that way does not return a scope. It returns
two arrays each and applies | operator on the result. See:
http://www.ruby-doc.org/core-1.9.3/Array.html#method-i-7C
I've looked arel docs (in fact, I just found
On 22 May 2012 01:58, Gustavo de Sá Carvalho Honorato
gustavohonor...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem of the first solution is that find_in_coverage |
find_known_missing combined that way does not return a scope. It returns
two arrays each and applies | operator on the result. See:
try
escopo: find_visibles, lambda { find_in_coverage.find_know_missing}
2012/5/21 Gustavo de Sá Carvalho Honorato gustavohonor...@gmail.com
The problem of the first solution is that find_in_coverage |
find_known_missing combined that way does not return a scope. It returns
two arrays each
Hi all!
I've googled all over and I couldn't find anything about chaining scopes
with OR instead of the default AND.
I have an Asset model with the following scopes:
class Asset ActiveRecord::Base
(...)
scope :find_in_coverage, lambda { where('timestamp(assets.found_at) =
?',
AFAIK, something like this should work:
def find_visibles
find_in_coverage | find_known_missing
end
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Gustavo de Sá Carvalho Honorato
gustavohonor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all!
I've googled all over and I couldn't find anything about chaining scopes
with
To add to that, if you want to construct complex queries, you should have a
look at arel https://github.com/rails/arel.
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:17 AM, azizmb.in m...@azizmb.in wrote:
AFAIK, something like this should work:
def find_visibles
find_in_coverage | find_known_missing
end
9 matches
Mail list logo
