[Rails] Re: {ActionController] Default route naming

Lee Smith wrote: > Looks fine to me...what are you expecting the route to be? Yes, I confused myself by using both named routes and resources. That and I got caught by Rails inflection system as forex has no plural so that the index action becomes forex_index GET, rather than forexes GET. I e

[Rails] Re: {ActionController] Default route naming

Looks fine to me...what are you expecting the route to be? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com To unsubsc

[Rails] Re: {ActionController] Default route naming

Lee Smith wrote: > Are you talking about singular resources? > > http://guides.rails.info/routing.html#singular-resources I am not talking about singular resources. > If not, you may want to show how you're declaring your route... map.resources :forex, :type => 'CABK', :contr

[Rails] Re: {ActionController] Default route naming

Are you talking about singular resources? http://guides.rails.info/routing.html#singular-resources If not, you may want to show how you're declaring your route... --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby