On 5 Jan 2009, at 21:18, Tom Lobato wrote:
>
> ok, thank you very much!!
> I will try it.
>
> Anyway, What are the "more general problem" you said?
>
Just the more general case of mapping xml fragments to objects.
Fred
> On 5 jan, 19:00, Frederick Cheung wrote:
>> On 5 Jan 2009, at 20:40, To
ok, thank you very much!!
I will try it.
Anyway, What are the "more general problem" you said?
On 5 jan, 19:00, Frederick Cheung wrote:
> On 5 Jan 2009, at 20:40, Tom Lobato wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 5 jan, 18:16, Frederick Cheung wrote:
> >> roxml is trying to solve a more general problem - if
On 5 Jan 2009, at 20:40, Tom Lobato wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5 jan, 18:16, Frederick Cheung wrote:
>> roxml is trying to solve a more general problem - if you models
>> aren't
>> activerecord models then they are not going to have a particularly
>> useful to_xml on it (the time i used it was generat
On 5 jan, 18:16, Frederick Cheung wrote:
> roxml is trying to solve a more general problem - if you models aren't
> activerecord models then they are not going to have a particularly
> useful to_xml on it (the time i used it was generated xml to pass to a
> webservice)
Sorry my bad engli
On 5 Jan 2009, at 20:08, Tom Lobato wrote:
>
>
> How they differ?
>
> Does the to_xml method of the classes array/hash/object is based on
> ROXML lib?
> As I see in http://roxml.rubyforge.org/#quickstart, roxml needs we
> define the class (class Book in the guide) before to convert a object
> to
5 matches
Mail list logo