On 4 June 2013 07:24, mark ronay wrote:
> just an update/follow up. I can successfully run rails and get a rails
> server going on my localhost. However, my paths remain totally messed up
> and I dont know why. I get the error I originally posted about anywhere
> I go (and I am completely certain
just an update/follow up. I can successfully run rails and get a rails
server going on my localhost. However, my paths remain totally messed up
and I dont know why. I get the error I originally posted about anywhere
I go (and I am completely certain I am not inside a path that already
has a rai
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:49 PM, mark ronay wrote:
> ruby -v gives ruby 1.9.3p429 (2013-05-15 revision 40747) [x86_64-linux]
> rails -v gives Rails 3.2.13
> gem -v gives 1.8.25
Those seem reasonable, though the result doesn't :-/
Given that you're just starting, I'd be inclined to totally remove
What is the command you are using to create a new rails app? Just to be
sure, type the command into a terminal window and copy / paste the command
you typed and the output from rails.
On Friday, May 31, 2013 7:49:14 PM UTC-4, Ruby-Forum.com User wrote:
>
> ruby -v gives ruby 1.9.3p429 (2013-05
ruby -v gives ruby 1.9.3p429 (2013-05-15 revision 40747) [x86_64-linux]
rails -v gives Rails 3.2.13
gem -v gives 1.8.25
Im running ubuntu. I had ruby 1.8.6. I installed gem but it gave an
error when I was trying to get rails through gem, bc i had the old
version of ruby. I got rvm, updated to 1.
5 matches
Mail list logo