Why should those J2EE guys have all the nice toys? I want my life made
easier too!
There are reasons why IDEs for RoR haven't all been stellar, one being that
all that metaprogramming magic must make Rails a really slippery framework
to build tools for, another the insane pace of change over the
> IDEs are often bloated and difficult to use compared to editors. For
> developing with technologies like J2EE, you need the extra power and
> features to make your life easier. For developing with technologies
> like Rails, the extra features just get in the way and slow things down.
Yes, some
pepe wrote in post #949821:
>> Likely what happened. In the context of the discussion as a whole, I
>> thought you were comparing IDEs and other editors. Apparently you
>> weren't. Sorry for misunderstanding.
>
> Same here.
>
>> >> And you don't need an IDE for that.
> [...]
>> Because there are ot
> Likely what happened. In the context of the discussion as a whole, I
> thought you were comparing IDEs and other editors. Apparently you
> weren't. Sorry for misunderstanding.
Same here.
> >> And you don't need an IDE for that.
[...]
> Because there are other tools out there providing equiva
pepe wrote in post #949706:
>> You said you like IDEs because of global search and replace
>> capabilities; you seemed to be implying that other editors couldn't do
>> that.
>
> To seem to an to actually do are different things.
>
>> But you yourself have just admitted that you don't know much abou
> You said you like IDEs because of global search and replace
> capabilities; you seemed to be implying that other editors couldn't do
> that.
To seem to an to actually do are different things.
> But you yourself have just admitted that you don't know much about text
> editors, so how can you eff
pepe wrote in post #949641:
>> Please don't mislead people about the features of editors.
>
> Not trying to. If you read more carefully you'll notice that I didn't
> even try to mention a single feature of text editors, among other
> things because I don't really know much about them. I was solely
RubyMine has some nice refactoring tools. I can't say I've pushed them very
hard, but when I have tried them they've worked well.
(Disclaimer: I have no connection to the company, I'm just a RubyMine user.)
On 12 October 2010 18:05, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
>
> > They also help with refactori
> Please don't mislead people about the features of editors.
Not trying to. If you read more carefully you'll notice that I didn't
even try to mention a single feature of text editors, among other
things because I don't really know much about them. I was solely
commenting on IDEs capabilities and
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
wrote:
>> They also help with refactoring, etc.
>
> Have you ever seen an IDE that actually does this effectively for Ruby?
> I have not.
Neither have I. Every Ruby IDE I've tried falls flat on it's face as
far as code completion. That would
pepe wrote in post #949502:
[...]
> Many people here don't like IDE's and like to just use a 'simpler'
> editor. Many of them like TextMate. I find IDEs useful if only because
> they allow you to search/replace easily any text within the project.
So do good (non-IDE) editors like TextMate or Komod
> i will change a label named "School Name" to "College Name" will I be
> able to change it using radrails or i have to go to my app directory and
> change it there in the particular file.
RadRails or any IDE will allow you to edit the files of your
application, so when you say 'using radrails or
On Oct 11, 2010, at 11:05 AM, radhames brito wrote:
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser > wrote:
Radhames Brito wrote:
> @hassan
>
> I believe he wants a wysiwyg for rails views.
You can use any WYSIWYG HTML editor for that -- with all the attendant
problems. The OP should
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Marnen Laibow-Koser
wrote:
> Radhames Brito wrote:
> > @hassan
> >
> > I believe he wants a wysiwyg for rails views.
>
> You can use any WYSIWYG HTML editor for that -- with all the attendant
> problems. The OP should learn HTML and do it right. :)
>
>
Yes but he
Radhames Brito wrote:
> @hassan
>
> I believe he wants a wysiwyg for rails views.
You can use any WYSIWYG HTML editor for that -- with all the attendant
problems. The OP should learn HTML and do it right. :)
Best,
--
Marnen Laibow-Koser
http://www.marnen.org
mar...@marnen.org
--
Posted via ht
Premanshu Mishra wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Willing to know if by using Editors, will we able to modify things(like
> labels,etc) on the view layer. Or is it safer to change them using
> individual files in the app/views folder ??
As far as I know, no.
But the magic of rails is that is so simple that y
16 matches
Mail list logo
