>> Are you using Firebug? If not, stop, get it, use it.
>> And it would be useful if you either posted the app somewhere public
>> or created a downloadable test case that demonstrates the issue.
I have been using firebug, I thought at times in the past there was a
'break on javascript error' o
Greg Donald wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Jedrin wrote:
>> try. Having empty tags in the
>
> Empty tags is invalid HTML.
No it's not. Check with the W3C validator. It has no problem with
> Use a non-breaking space or
> something similar to make it valid.
That's no more or
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Hassan Schroeder
wrote:
> I assumed the OP meant "empty"
Yeah, typo, I usually do something like
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Greg Donald wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Jedrin wrote:
>> try. Having empty tags in the
>
> Empty tags is invalid HTML. Use a non-breaking space or
> something similar to make it valid.
>
>
?? I assumed the OP meant "empty" but what
you pr
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Jedrin wrote:
> try. Having empty tags in the
Empty tags is invalid HTML. Use a non-breaking space or
something similar to make it valid.
--
Greg Donald
http://destiney.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this messa
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Jedrin wrote:
>
> Maybe what it is is I can't generate any or tags in my
> partial that renders the ajax stuff. If any empty ones I have won't
> show as a row until I render into them, maybe that is what I should
> try. Having empty tags in the original and t
Maybe what it is is I can't generate any or tags in my
partial that renders the ajax stuff. If any empty ones I have won't
show as a row until I render into them, maybe that is what I should
try. Having empty tags in the original and then render into
the inside of them with ajax .. I'm guess
I didn't quite understand what you meant.
However, this whole approach is having numerous problems, though I
did get an rjs focus to work. I'm not sure if it's because there is a
table inside the form, but the basic thing is I want to change form
fields using ajax. If you have a some text fiel
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Jedrin wrote:
> I don't suppose there is any easy way to tell what the focus was when
> observe_form sends the call to the server ?
Uh, the suggestion in my previous message? :-)
--
Hassan Schroeder hassan.schroe...@gmail.com
twitter:
That seems to work, thanks alot, things are looking a little better
now.
I don't suppose there is any easy way to tell what the focus was when
observe_form sends the call to the server ?
Right now I just keep the fields in a session and see which one
changed, which is sort of a hack and prone t
Hi Jedrin,
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 08:04 -0700, Jedrin wrote:
> Is there a way to focus through RJS ?
page['element_id'].focus()
Best regards,
Bill
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Ta
Since I rerender the form using ajax, I am not sure if
document.myform.myfield.focus() will work and I have not had any luck.
Is there a way to focus through RJS ?
The best approach I can think of is to get rid of the form and have a
field observer for each field, save the values in a session an
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Jedrin wrote:
> Actually, the problem with re rendering the form and setting the
> focus is knowing what the focus was before observe_form sent the
> request to the server. The most obvious hack way is to keep the form
> values in a session and see which one cha
Actually, the problem with re rendering the form and setting the
focus is knowing what the focus was before observe_form sent the
request to the server. The most obvious hack way is to keep the form
values in a session and see which one changed since the last time.
That might work if the duratio
14 matches
Mail list logo
