Re: [Rails] Re: routes.rb and configuration over convention

2012-03-16 Thread tydeas
That's what exactly I am trying to explain and think the issue is. You have convention on how to configure something where you should had convention to avoid configuration (at least when still in the beginning of your development process). So let me describe what imho is proper convention over

[Rails] Re: routes.rb and configuration over convention

2012-03-15 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
The 14/03/12, tydeas wrote: Hello there, I am new to the rails framework. I have seen that rails uses the Convention over configuration philosophy. Then when I create a controller post_controller I have to actually configure it in the routes.rb file to get it working. Is this the other way