I get exactly the same behavior, running on 4 different machines, and I
think it is the same bug that I reported last week on Drools version
5.1.1. See the screen shot attached to this JIRA, and add your comments
to it...
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-636
I get exactly the same behavior, running on 4 different machines, and I
think it is the same bug that I reported last week on Drools version
5.1.1. See the screen shot attached to this JIRA, and add your comments
to it...
https://jira.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-636
Ken Kawamoto had the same issue. I am attaching contents of his email to
me:
Had same problems with a clean install using JBoss App Server, with just
the default examples. Default test scenarios led to same problems: saved
generally okay
When i try to copy, it give me an option to choose a name but the new rule
is added to the same package...
what am i missing?
2010/9/26 Esteban Aliverti esteban.alive...@gmail.com
You can open the rule, then go to Actions-Copy to make a copy of the rule
in another package.
Best,
Hi Mark,
I would like to get involved as well. However, until the end of this year I
don't think I will be much available. I should have more free time from
mid-January on.
Anyway, JudCon Berlin is happening on October 2010, so I think that in
Europe it should be happening more at the end of
On 2010/9/27 15:59, Nadav Hashimshony wrote:
When i try to copy, it give me an option to choose a name but the new
rule is added to the same package...
what am i missing?
You need to select a package from the New Package drop down list. Make
sure you have selected a different package.
Cheers,
In short no.
Activations are determined when Facts are inserted into WorkingMemory not
when a call to fire the rules is made. Consequentially, IMO, through put
is really limited to how quickly you can insert Facts into the network. You
could have multiple threads inserting Facts into different
My rule engine server is multi threaded.
in the server main i build a knowledgebase:
KnowledgeBuilderConfiguration config =
KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilderConfiguration(droolsConf, null);
KnowledgeBuilder builder =
KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder(config);
I would have thought you could re-use the same session in a given single
Thread - Session is not Thread-Safe but not unsafe to reuse.
As an aside, I wonder whether you can use a single session across all
Threads if you used different Entry Points for each Thread (although you'd
probably have to
I have a very simple process with one RuleFlow Group.
I am registering an object via the variables.
I have several rules which I am trying to get to fire.
I have rules which constraints on the object I registered that are not
working. I have rules with constraints on the WorkflowProcess I
Hi David,
I saw your issue and I'm noticing the same behavior with regards to saving
changes to
my test scenario. However, I see the count disconnect even after I get changes
to save
correctly, close the test scenario tab, reopen it, and then run it again.
My sense is this is a separate issue
I create a knowledge base in the typical fashion. I construct a knowledge
builder and add my drl and rf files, then instantiate my knowledge base.
I build my parameter map and then start the process using my knowledge base.
StatefulKnowledgeSession session =
you can try activating the KnowledgeRuntimeLogger to see what is happening
inside the knowledge session.. you will find the answers there..
If you can share what objects are you inserting inside the parameter maps
and how your rules looks like we can help..
Also if your process define the
I would also defer to those with greater knowledge, but it is clear that
there are some issues in Guvnor where there is a disconnect between what
is shown on the screen, and what is happening on the back end. We find
this disconnect in a number of different areas and most of the components
of
Hi All,
We are evaluating Drools flow and looking for the parallel processing (multiple
threads) of few activities in the flow.
Could you please confirm if this is already supported for there are any plans
for this functionality.
Note : (I tried the Gateway[diverge] but it runs in the
Hi
I'm not sure about the version.
ganesh
--- On Thu, 23/9/10, Michael Anstis michael.ans...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Michael Anstis michael.ans...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [rules-users] iisue with Operator 'Operator = ''' does not exist
for StringEvaluator
To: Rules Users List
You can model that functionality as a custom work item that instantiate
different threads inside it..
but gateways doesn't represent multithreading - concurrent executions.
2010/9/27 Prafull Kumar to_praf...@yahoo.com
Hi All,
We are evaluating Drools flow and looking for the parallel
if you jars says 4.0.7, it's drools 4.0.7.. no doubt about that..
2010/9/27 Ganesh Krishnan ganesh...@yahoo.co.in
Hi
I'm not sure about the version.
ganesh
--- On *Thu, 23/9/10, Michael Anstis michael.ans...@gmail.com* wrote:
From: Michael Anstis michael.ans...@gmail.com
Subject: Re:
Here is my object:
package com.rrd.xspace.drools;
import java.io.Serializable;
public class FooInstance implements Serializable
{
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 132337L;
private String action = EDITING;
That's because you are evaluating a Process Variable as a fact.. and it's
not a fact. You cannot do:
i : FooInstance(action == 'EDITING')
Because inside the working memory there is no FooInstance.
If you want to do that.. you should insert the FooInstance instead of
defining it as process
I tried inserting FooInstance as a fact but then it seems to have nothing to
do with the process. In my second rule I am trying to get at the
WorkFlowProcess in my constraints but this rule will not consistantly fire.
It only seems to work when the Test run is there.
I found this in my log.
Can you write a rule with a registered process variable in a constraint
without referencing it through WorkflowProcessInstance?
The examples in chapter 8 of the Drools Java Rules 5.0 Developers book he
seems to be doing that with the Loan object or am I missing something?
Bob
--
View this
anyone out there who successfully invoked ksession.dispose() method in your
application code which uses spring jpa transaction manager with drools
--
View this message in context:
attach a exception handler to the fault node , either log the exception to
the file or generate a record to the reporting db.
-drooRam
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Fault-node-in-rule-flow-tp1572596p1592654.html
Sent from the Drools - User
I wouldn't reuse a stateless session. You could reuse a stateful session and
clean up between runs, but session creation is not that expensive. (and easily
less expensive than cleanup of a stateful session, mattering on the complexity
of your rules)
GreG
On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:39, Nadav
Hi,
If u have used the exception handler in ur code ,can u plz share the same
code. same methods as in work item handler can be used in exception handler
also.what can be written in textual editor of exception handling and how it
can be used.
Thanx
--
View this message in context:
26 matches
Mail list logo
