[rules-users] WS-Notifications support in Drools

Hi, Does Drools provides any support for WS-Notifications specifications. Does Drools have any implementations for WS-Notification specification e.t.c Many thanks in advance for any answer Yes or No. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/WS-Notifications-support

Re: [rules-users] Drools Planner: Solving a job schedule problem

Thanks for your answer. In PAS, a bed in a room gets assigned to an admission. Adapting this example on my problem, only the bed is in any interest. The bed would be the machine to which I’m scheduling my jobs to. A job would be an admission. But in difference to PAS, in my problem the admissions

[rules-users] same criteria across multiple rules cancels activation with Property Reactive Facts

I have come across a problem of unexpected cancels on activations when using property reactive facts. The problem occurs if two or more rules have the same criteria. I have uploaded all the files and a unit test to show this using a very simple bare bones example: pom.xml

Re: [rules-users] Drools Planner: Solving a job schedule problem

Hi, not sure I got all the details (seeing rules could help, I did not understand what is wrong with your approach). As far I undertand, you already has a list containing the jov sequence, so you can update "prevJob" and "nextJob" attributes of you planning variables "Job". If yes, let's say

Re: [rules-users] same criteria across multiple rules cancels activation with Property Reactive Facts

This is certainly a bug, as it is definitely not what one expects from the description of property reactive. Existing activations that do not mention the modified property should not be affected. I have created a similar test case, and it fails the same way. It seems that "property reactive" is b

Re: [rules-users] same criteria across multiple rules cancels activation with Property Reactive Facts

Hi , I re ran the test using drools 5.4.0 too, same problem. In the majority of our cases Property Reactive Facts work really well. Not using this feature is not really an option that we would like to take as we would have to rewrite the rules. We have thousands of rules. Can you please let me

Re: [rules-users] same criteria across multiple rules cancels activation with Property Reactive Facts

On 14 Dec 2012, at 14:10, m11 wrote: > Hi , > > I re ran the test using drools 5.4.0 too, same problem. In the majority of > our cases Property Reactive Facts work really well. Not using this feature > is not really an option that we would like to take as we would have to > rewrite the rules.

[rules-users] Using Guvnor with Seam

Hi, I'm very interested in using Drools Guvnor with Seam and was hoping someone here may have some experience of doing this. I've currently got Seam 2.3 working fine with Guvnor 5.3. My question is, is it possible to get Seam 2.3 working with Guvnor 5.5? Or is it necessary to move onto Seam 3 in

[rules-users] Injecting methods dynamically with groovy in types used by the rules.

Is it possible to add methods in groovy dynamically (with metaclass) and then call them from the drls? I tried a simple test but I got a "unable to resolve method" error at runtime. Thank you for any suggestions, Lumi -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Inject

[rules-users] (no subject)

http://trespassagain.com/CISTERCIAN_WILDERNESS/_notes/q5tcdl4x.php___ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users