Hi,
if you're new, why not trying the last final release?
http://www.jboss.org/drools/downloads.html
You'll find 5.1 final Guvnor there, which has just been released some two
weeks ago.
But "installation" of Guvnor is not "installation" of Drools!
Good luck!
Von: rules-user
Without having that much knowledge about Guvnor... what comes to my mind is
to define a Domain Specific Language which provids everything the end user
might need. This way he / she just needs to create the rules by "clicking"
and not "programming".
Stating this though I didn't try it yet J
You
Thanks for your confirmation. Can anyone else report a case like that? I
didn't progress much in finding an explanation so far. If anyone else could
confirm, maybe this is some kind of common problem, maybe even a bug?
Is there something like a public issue tracker? Still, more cases would help,
d
Thanks for replying. I actually read the post, but I thought the answer
referred to update sites regarding candidate releases - not finals as well.
But probably I got it wrong.
Sorry for the noise!
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bou
Hi,
is there any reason why 5.1. final Eclipse Workbench is not put into an
Update Site? Sure it is possible just to drop in the content of the zip, but
I think Update Sites are far more comfortable :-)
Furthermore, there actually is an Update Site - but it's kind of empty...? On
purpose?
Just did the same, downloading the zip right now.
My content looks like this:
~/drools # ls -l
total 4512
-rw-rw-r-- 1 gmai gmai 11358 Jul 30 10:22 LICENSE-ASL-2.0.txt
-rw-rw-r-- 1 gmai gmai3084 Jul 30 10:22 README_DEPENDENCIES.txt
-rw-rw-r-- 1 gmai gmai 12866 Jul 30 10:22 drool
Hi,
I am using Drools 5.1 (final) in an OSGi environment. When invoking
fireUntilHalt() for my StatefulKnowledgeSession, CPU load rises to 25%
(meaning one complete core on the quad-core machine). Needless to say, when
two sessions are used in different components at the same time I'm reaching
his could even be written:
rule NoUpChild
when
$p : Device( children.size > 0 )
not( Device( parent == $p, state == "UP" ) )
then
System.out.println( $p.getId() + ": no child up" );
end
-W
2010/8/2 Georg Maier
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out an issue f
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out an issue for three days now and I'm getting kind of
desperate, so I hope someone can help.
I'm using Drools in combination with an EMF model which is modeling a
computer network. On init, I read the whole structure of the model and insert
all elements into the work
Hi,
is there a way to observe (during runtime) when Drools evaluates the
condition of which rule, meaning when it "tries" to activate a rule?
I'm having a bug in my program and I can't determine whether objects are out
of sync, there is a mistake in my rule or (and I started believing in that
mes that names are unique.
Thomas
From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Georg Maier
Sent: 26 May 2010 12:27
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Detecting two instances of the same
eventwithFusion Rules
Hi,
th
n why you shouldn't be able to use it
with not as well:
$that : Thing(...)
not ( Thing( this != $that,... ) )
"Given one Thing (with constraints...) and *not* having any *other* Thing
(with constraints...), then..."
-W
2010/5/26 Georg Maier
Hi,
I'm new to Droo
Hi,
I'm new to Drools and currently trying to implement some examples using CEP /
Fusion. I got stuck on a problem to which I can't find any solution in the
online documentation, so I'm hoping for your help.
I'm trying to write a rule, which is activated whenever a certain event
occurs and no
13 matches
Mail list logo
