May be worth checking what class/interface your bean is. In the code that
works, you are casting it to StatelessKieSession, but I suspect that the object
which was injected was a KieSession.
Steve
On 19 Aug 2014, at 15:17, Ged Byrne wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> This may be a problem with Spring r
Possibly also worth pointing out that inserting a fact and executing a session
do not connect to Guvnor anyway?
Although, as Mike mentions, the simplest approach tends to be to create a
service which wraps knowledge base access and mock that. Although you could
also mock the session.
Although,
Your specific rules have so much more impact on these stats than any of the
factors you mention such as numbers of rules and facts.
The number of rules by itself has very little impact on performance, except at
start-up time. There are knowledge bases out there with > 100,000 rules, which
achie
If you explode the WAR, you should find an index.jsp and CSS. Modify them to
your heart’s content.
On 1 Jul 2014, at 11:26, LaKhI ReDdY!!! wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to change the Header color(top header) and Logo in Guvnor 5.3.3.Final.
> Any points on where and all i need to do changes?
Looks close enough to what I tend to do. It could be worth firing off something
like the following to double-check that your knowledge base and working memory
are as expected prior to each test.
/**
* Iterates through the facts currently in working memory, and logs their
details.
Pretty much correct.
re. 5 - It depends on what you mean by it becoming clear that a release is a
bad one.
I have tended to code up my own knowledge base reloads and check for errors,
but I’m pretty sure that if your rules don’t compile, then neither the
KnowledgeAgent nor the KieScanner will
If you want to hot-deploy rule changes, just take a look at the documentation
on knowledge agents or KieScanner (v6). It’s also easy enough to code a
knowledge base reload yourself.
However, you say:
Ideally we would like business users to add or modify rules in
Production without risk
These test classes do that between them (with a bit of help from some others):
https://github.com/gratiartis/qzr/blob/master/sctrcd-drools/src/test/java/com/sctrcd/drools/spring/DroolsSpringTest.java
https://github.com/gratiartis/qzr/blob/master/sctrcd-drools/src/test/java/com/sctrcd/drools/sprin
column should rely on value specified in differente
> column. It is possible somehow?
>
> From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Masters
> Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 2:55 PM
> To: Drools List
> Subject:
It’s not available at runtime. It seems to be there just to help you document
things and search within Guvnor/Workbench.
On 8 Apr 2014, at 12:28, Andrei Ermicioi wrote:
> Can somebody point me on some article, tutorial, etc where will be describe
> the work with METADATA from decision tables?
Assuming that you’re sticking to 5.0, you’ll need to code it yourself. The
simplest way I found was to create a web service, with an operation which
destroys your current sessions and knowledge bases, and reinitialises them. You
should be able to re-use whatever code you already have for initial
Not sure whether you reformatted the DSL for the mailing list, but it’s worth
pointing out that each phrase defined in the DSL needs to be on a single line.
This may have changed in a newer version of Drools (my DSL runs in 5.3), but
DSL hasn’t been given much attention for a while, so I suspect
DSL is essentially just templates which map phrases (which may look a bit like
natural language) to DRL.
DSLR is the actual rules and looks a bit like normal DRL, except that inside
the ‘when’ and ‘then’ sections you tend to find phrases based on the DSL. This
is the bit which could possibly be
@KBaseConfig(name=“kbase1”, packages=“my.domain.fld, my.domain.fld2" )
>> public static class kbase1Config {
>>
>> @KSessionConfig(name=“ksession1”, clockType=“pseudo”)
>> private KieSession kieSession1;
>>
>> @KSessionConfig(name=“ksession2”, clockType
It definitely wouldn’t miss out on any Drools 6 functionality. It enables you
to use everything that is available in 6.x because it give you direct access to
the API.
Steve
On 28 Feb 2014, at 19:41, vinodkiran wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Interesting approach. I am looking through your code.
>
> I
Probably … I don’t think it uses anything that is specific to Spring 4. Fairly
sure it’s all valid for for most of 3.x.
On 28 Feb 2014, at 18:22, mattmadhavan wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> Thank you and I will review your code soon.
>
> My client is still at Spring 3.x and we are not moving to Spri
My tip would be to not use the Spring stuff provided as part of Drools. It has
always targeted old versions of Spring that I don’t want to use. :)
Just a little earlier today, I made the following repo public:
https://github.com/gratiartis/qzr
… which demonstrates a web application using
Hi folks,
This may well be rather premature, but I have been knocking up a little example
project to demo a web application built with Spring 4 and Drools 6. Notably,
*not* using the Drools Spring componentry because I prefer to roll my own
Spring components. It gives me a lot of freedom to mak
What sort of thing are you looking for? Open source demos with source code?
Proprietary applications?
I have a few trivial examples of web applications with REST services in GitHub.
Also, I have a few works in progress in private repos built around v6. Due to
be de-privatised when I get them to
Generally speaking, if you are seeing combinatorial explosions as a result of
matching facts of the same type, then you should be looking to add constraints
to your pattern matches to reduce them.
It’s always possible that there are no additional constraints that you could
apply to achieve this
Depending on your rules, you should be able to insert large numbers of facts
and then fire all rules.
Note that it’s worth testing the optimal number to insert each time. I have
previously found it faster to insert in batches, rather than hundreds. Partly
because of the smaller memory footprint
Re. Referencing EJBs and JPA form inside rules.
Yes, you can do it. However, I have tended to find that it’s best to avoid it
if possible. It’s much easier and less error prone, to manage that kind of
thing from outside the rules engine.
On 4 Feb 2014, at 17:06, John Manko wrote:
> I need so
Ah … I was looking at the original request about being able to set a value
using a text field or an enumeration. It would appear that’s no longer the
topic.
For examples like that, you might be better off using a DSL. That way you could
have a nice phrase with a drop-down menu driven by your en
Of course, you could just create multiple get/set methods for an attribute.
String myConstraint;
getPredefinedConstraint() {
return myConstraint;
}
setPredefinedConstraint(String predefinedConstraint) {
this.myConstraint = predefinedConstraint;
}
getUnrestrictedConstraint() {
return m
, Stephen Masters wrote:
> The Maven Shade plugin is relatively simple to use. Below is the XML in my
> pom.xml. Basically, it finds all of the jars which are required by your
> project and bundles all of the classes (and other resources) from them into a
> single big fat jar. Thi
The Maven Shade plugin is relatively simple to use. Below is the XML in my
pom.xml. Basically, it finds all of the jars which are required by your project
and bundles all of the classes (and other resources) from them into a single
big fat jar. This means that keeping track of what you have adde
Basically, none of my enumeration methods were being called. It appeared to be
a bug, which I raised in Jira. Mike Anstis tested it in 5.6 quite a while back
(maybe a year ago), and whatever was wrong seems to have been fixed.
If you want to try it, I’d recommend creating a minimal enumeration c
There may be better ways of doing it in newer versions of Guvnor, but the way I
did it for for 5.3 made use of Spring. Unfortunately, this did not work in 5.5.
Your code will need to do all of its database connectivity itself. Therefore it
does need to include the DB connectivity jars. I ensured
at is why I am trying to identify if it is possible to recive the rule
>> metadata from Drools. At first I thought it could be available in a snap of
>> a finger with some method calls, however now I am interested to see what is
>> the effort to make it happen.
>>
It may also be worth explaining exactly what you aim to achieve through this
and why. From what I have seen, most people who ask about introspecting the LHS
of rules via the API, don’t actually need to do that.
Steve
On 7 Jan 2014, at 08:56, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while you continue
fwiw … a couple of examples of event listeners:
Rule activations:
https://github.com/gratiartis/sctrcd-payment-validation-web/blob/master/src/main/java/com/sctrcd/drools/util/TrackingAgendaEventListener.java
Fact insertions, modifications and retractions:
https://github.com/gratiartis/sctrcd-paym
My experience switching a small project from 5.5.0.Final to 5.6.0.CR1 a few
days ago, was that the only thing I had to do was change the Drools version
number in my Maven pom.xml.
It is a fairly simple project though, so it doesn’t exercise a great deal of
the platform.
On 18 Dec 2013, at 07
s.runtime.CommandExecutor
> has the generic
>T execute(Command command)
>
> So you dig around in the code and may detect that ksession.execute(
> cmd ) with cmd being made by newInsertElements(...) returns a
> Collection. Mighty helpful.
>
> Fixing the Experts would h
, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> I think you have to put your insert command into a list
> List> cmds = new ArrayList();
> and pass this via batch execution
> CommandFactory.newBatchExecution( cmds )
>
> -W
>
> On 04/12/2013, Stephen Masters wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>&g
Hi folks,
Can anyone explain how stateless session execution results should work? Working
through the docs and tracing the code, it’s getting a bit confusing.
Firstly, according to the user manual, one should be able to insert a list of
facts as a Command, and get an instance of ExecutionResult
When you say that it won’t help to increase the permgen size, are you saying
that you have tried it and it didn’t work?
What size does it reach, given an extra gig or 2? How much is it growing for
each redeployment?
Also from your explanation, it would appear that permgen is hitting 500 meg
be
Hi Mark and the gang,
Not sure whether you guys have seen this already (I’m guessing some of you must
in in LJC), but if you’re looking for more London-based developers to get
involved in the community side of Drools/KIE related projects, then it might be
worth checking this out.
Steve
Begin
Of course, you can just bypass the built in “-“ processing.
[condition][]There is a Person = $p: Person()
[condition][]The person is aged over "{age}” =$age: Integer(this > {age}) from
$person.age
Of course that does require that you’re careful about writing the DSLR, so that
you always bind a
That rule would work if you added a “name” property to Country.
As a general tip on working with countries, always work with their ISO codes,
not their names.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1
… ideally the 2-char codes, which are much more commonly used than the 3-char
codes.
Feel free
I don't understand "if a Java fact is being used". Sure, the
> object filter's accept takes an object, so object.getClass() is the
> typical way to go. But why the detour into strings?
> StudentBean.class isn't much longer than the class name as a
> st
Good point Wolfgang … it’s a bit of my code that I provided. I tend to use
SimpleName to make it easy to find declared types as well as Java classes. But
if a Java fact is being used, then getClass() is a much better idea.
On 10 Nov 2013, at 07:27, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Digging a bit into Ja
s I don't
> really have the idea of how can I do this )
> 4. Add to the model attribute the data that has been send by .drl file.
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong. And please guide me a bit more to this.
>
>
> Stephen Masters wrote
>> Given that you’re using
Given that you’re using Spring MVC, this might be a reasonable example:
https://github.com/gratiartis/sctrcd-payment-validation-web
It has examples of doing this for a simple validation, with a stateless session.
i.e.
Request goes to Spring MVC controller.
Controller invokes a service be
I avoid knowledge agents myself. It doesn’t take a lot of code to build a
knowledge base, and I like to have a more deliberate ‘push’ of new/updated
rules. When I'm not planning on changing rules, I just load them from the
classpath. If I intend to change them at runtime, then I load them from a
group set end up in
> the "MAIN" (or "DEFAULT", I don't remember)
> agenda group and then behave accordingly.
> Could you post the Drools version number and some more details on the
> example and the "unexpected" behavior?
> Thanks
> D
Hi folks,
According to the user guide, lock-on-active “inhibits additional activations of
all rules with this flag set within the same rule flow or agenda group”.
I was doing a little testing of some rules earlier today, and noticed that
lock-on-active seems to change behaviour when applied to
See the lines:
WorkingMemory workingMemory = ruleBase.newStatefulSession();
StatefulKnowledgeSession ksession = kbase.newStatefulKnowledgeSession();
Everything before those lines should be running on application start-up. i.e.
Stored in variables at the class level (as long as the
Rather than creating the knowledge base every time a request is made, you
should be creating a knowledge base once. Probably during application start-up.
Each request should just trigger creating a new session, which may well take
just a few milliseconds.
Steve
On 5 Nov 2013, at 10:17, arpitm
; $ratio:(volumeAccumulations["total"]/consolidatdVolume.avgVolume))
> should be discarded. This value can safely be computed on the RHS
> where the denominator's value being !=0 is asserted.
>
> -W
>
> On 01/11/2013, Stephen Masters wrote:
>> Divide by zer
Divide by zero exceptions usually occur when you try to divide by zero.
So … first question … is consolidatdVolume.avgVolume ever zero?
On 1 Nov 2013, at 16:17, gboro54 wrote:
> I have rules like the following:
>
> rule "Add Baseline to Context if it does not exists exists or not greater
> th
In version 5 of Guvnor that information is available on each rule. It includes
a version history and the name of the user who made each change.
It’s on the “Attribute” tab.
Steve
On 28 Oct 2013, at 01:24, nzhu972 wrote:
> in Guvnor for Drools 5, is there a way to audit which user made change
My approach has been to connect Eclipse to Guvnor in the two environments. I
can then refresh each of them and run a compare between the 2 directory
structures. Once I had done it a couple of times, it became pretty smooth.
Steve
On 21 Oct 2013, at 09:49, Peach Wyss wrote:
> Hy all
>
> We'
It's not something I'm very familiar with, but I can see that there's an error
relating to Servlet 2.3, whilst the Jar it's loading is version 3.0.
Not too sure what the resolution would be though. Perhaps Guvnor 5.5 doesn't
work on Tomcat 6? Tomcat 7 was the version which introduced Servlet 3.0
It's worth noting that the rule generated for each row does have that row's
number in its name. Therefore if you have an AgendaEventListener running, you
can see the number if the rule fires. Useful if you're looking to debug/audit
the rules which are activated.
Steve
On 16 Oct 2013, at 19:52
I would recommend implementing and testing the persistence without Drools
first. Given that you're using Spring, then the Spring Data project can make it
ultra-simple to create repository classes.
http://docs.spring.io/spring-data/data-commons/docs/1.6.1.RELEASE/reference/html/repositories.html
You will need to write an Identity Store implementation. The following code is
an example of using one for LDAP (Active Directory).
https://gist.github.com/gratiartis/4545962
I wrote that for 5.3. I *think* that means it should be okay for 5.2, but I
don't really know.
I don't think that there
If you hand-crank the rules based on DSL, then you may be interested in Paul
King's talk at SpringOne 2GX last month:
https://springone2gx.com/conference/santa_clara/2013/09/session?id=29410
http://www.slideshare.net/paulk_asert/groovy-rules
I can't find any video of the talk online at the mome
Something to consider is how you want to scale. If you separate things, then
you do have the advantage that you can scale out the web layer easily, whilst
maintaining a long running session for your rules evaluation. On the other hand
if your rules work well within stateless sessions, that's not
Probably worth showing us the code for "testdrl".
On 6 Sep 2013, at 09:48, pritha.gh...@wipro.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whenever I am setting the dialect as java the following error comes
>
> “[testdrl] Unable to generate rule invoker. CountryPriceModeltest cannot be
> resolved to a type Country
or partially own rules
> authoring) from my limited experience so far, option #2 is the best
> approach.
>
> Let's know what you decide eventually and the challenges / opportunities
>
> Genene
>
> -Original Message-
> From: rules-users-boun...
That sounds like a bug I came across a little while back.
A bug in my code, not Drools. ;)
If you create listeners and attach them to a session, then of course, you need
to remove them manually. The session will have references to them, so they can
never be garbage collected. It's the same wit
As far as I know, we're stuck with it.
Or at least I have never found a way around it other than trying to break the
DSL sentences up. :(
On 5 Sep 2013, at 20:25, Sean Su wrote:
> Does anyone know if we can force the DSL statement in Guvnor to be displayed
> with multiple lines when it is to
My preference is option 1 … using a Spring application with a class which wraps
a knowledge base / session. This has the advantage that sometimes I really do
want to be able to mix up rules results with logic that I want to implement in
Java code.
There's obviously a performance impact if you a
It depends on what kind of rule it is.
If it's a 'technical' (DRL) rule, then you just add "no-loop" after the rule
name.
If it's a web based decision table, then it's on the "attributes" tab for that
table.
As Rich mentioned, it's much easier for us to help if you post the rule/code.
Steve
The usual reason would be that you have a rule which is updating a fact on
which it has a constraint. After each update it is therefore re-evaluated. In
which case, you just need to add "no-loop" to it.
Steve
On 5 Sep 2013, at 10:47, Smurfs wrote:
> Hi
> I am working on guvnor in jboss.
>
It could be worth using the REST API to browse to the source of each package.
It would be telling if the DRL included imports for com.mypkg.a.Foo and
com.mypkg.b.Foo depending on which package it was in.
Steve
On 4 Sep 2013, at 18:43, Lance Leverich wrote:
> The issue isn't that Foo cannot b
Hi folks,
There seem to be quite a few queries on using Spring and Grails with Drools
just recently, so I was just wondering whether anybody is heading to SpringOne
2GX next week. If anyone is going, it might be fun to meet up and natter about
what we're all up to.
Please do give me a shout if
If you use Maven to build it as a war, then it's simple to deploy to Tomcat.
Nothing special needs to be done.
My preferred way of doing this is to create a Spring web application, as it
makes REST services simple. Create a Spring bean to wrap the knowledge base &
session (if it's a long-runnin
As a general rule, query the database in the Java code, and insert the objects
retrieved as facts in the session. Then your LHS just needs to match on those
facts. Either that or populate a global.
If you have a stateless session, then you could get away with facts with getter
methods which ret
There's a known bug in authentication for with that version:
https://community.jboss.org/thread/206645
Perhaps that's the trouble you're having?
However, it's worth pointing out that the users that are set up within Guvnor
do not have logins. Instead they need to match up to existing use
It sounds like you might need to look at activation groups. Otherwise, just
create separate knowledge bases to cover the different blends of packages you
wish to work together.
Steve
On 28 Aug 2013, at 08:30, rganesh84 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reply. I understand that.
>
> However
Every DSL template phrase must be written on a single line. That's just how the
syntax works.
Hence why I do unfortunately have lines of DSL that are over 1000 characters
long. :(
Steve
On 27 Aug 2013, at 19:14, Stefan wrote:
> I have written a simple DSLR-rule with a rather long sentence
o maintain, but well worth it in terms of the
power and simplicity it offers to users.
tip - Don't bother using the DSL editor in Guvnor or in Eclipse. in 5.5 it
doesn't actually work (bug has since been fixed), and any plain text editor is
better anyway.
On 12 Aug 2013, at 15:51, M
uot; rules creation? I
> read that Guvnor could be embedded, but not sure that really helps either.
>
> --
> Mark Bennett / LucidWorks: Search & Big Data / mark.benn...@lucidworks.com
> Office: 408-898-4201 / Telecommute: 408-733-0387 / Cell: 408-829-6513
>
> On Aug 10, 2013,
Your plan seems about right to me. When working in pure Drools, you don't
always need to do this. However, when working in Guvnor, I have always found it
necessary to create a simplified domain model for facts.
In Guvnor, you can bind variables to fields and drill in, but it's fiddly.
Guided ru
Only a few minutes of our time spent responding I suspect. I was more concerned
that you could easily spend days developing an inappropriate solution which
would need to be re-written. :)
As a rule, when asking questions here, it's far better to explain the problem
you're trying to solve. Witho
>> According to my requirement I have to keep rule for each book separately.
>
> That's the weirdest thing I ever heard. What's the point?
It sounds to me like one of the following:
A poor requirement from someone who doesn't understand the technology.
An overly literal interpretation of a requ
ing memory with specific property values.
Steve
On 7 Aug 2013, at 10:40, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Nice, but is the result better than the default toString() that's
> doing much the same thing?
>
> -W
>
>
> On 07/08/2013, Stephen Masters wrote:
>
cular properties.
Steve
On 7 Aug 2013, at 10:27, Stephen Masters wrote:
> Add commons beanutils to your project:
>
>
> commons-beanutils
> commons-beanutils
> 1.8.3
>
>
> The
Add commons beanutils to your project:
commons-beanutils
commons-beanutils
1.8.3
Then all you need is a class with a static method something like this:
public static String objectDetails
As far as I have ever been able to work out, the 'expander' keyword is
redundant. If you add a DSL to the knowledge base, then it is active, and the
expander keyword is not required.
I am curious whether it used to do something which it is no longer needed for,
whether it's needed for an obscur
I'm not aware of an 'out of the box' mechanism for this. However, my own
preference for doing this is to get the RHS insert a restriction fact.
Essentially, you have no LHS, so that that all rules in the decision table will
fire after creating a session, inserting something like:
Customer :: id
There is a REST API to enable an application such as yours to integrate with
Guvnor:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.5.0.Final/drools-guvnor-docs/html/ch09.html
Steve
On 5 Aug 2013, at 12:58, ashish6276 wrote:
> I am trying those things.
>
> Apart from this is there any way
authorizing the
> rules. But I will keep that as an option.
>
> Thanks
>
> Sean
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Stephen Masters
> wrote:
> Something to consider, which I have used for some rules is that instead of
> those rules making a 'decisi
Something to consider, which I have used for some rules is that instead of
those rules making a 'decision' they can insert a restriction fact.
You can then create technical rules, which match on those restriction facts.
Also, it's very simple to write code to look at the facts in the working
me
So far I have stuck with 5.3.0. It's not perfect, but I have found it pretty
good and reliable.
I think that 5.4.0 was a reasonable improvement, but I haven't used it in
anger. For me, there wasn't enough improvement in it from 5.3 to merit spending
time on an upgrade, so I was waiting for 5.5.
technical staff. This is why
> there is a need to build these log information automatically by accessing
> "rule LHS" through API.
>
> Visiting rules and their histories after the rule name has been logged is
> always an option for this process. However it takes time
yours is failing. The project above uses Drools 5.4.0.
I'm guessing that you're using 5.5.0.Final, because if I switch version in my
pom.xml, then I get a NullPointerException. I suspect that you have hit upon
one of the many bugs in 5.5.0.Final.
Steve
On 30 Jul 2013, at 09:5
It may be worth looking at what exception is being thrown now. You need to
ensure that none of those classes have static flags on them (or the Java won't
compile), and the Message.message method needs to become a constructor instead
of some kind of static factory, so that the RHS of your rule in
The fact that all of your classes were static was ringing alarm bells, so I
tested it without that.
It works perfectly well if you remove 'static' from everything.
Steve
On 30 Jul 2013, at 08:43, schenka7 wrote:
> I have appended the code that leads to the exception.
>
> I have also noticed
Do your other applications log the source code of the application every time a
call is made to it?
It may be better to look at what Guvnor has to offer. For instance, it provides
version history of the rules, so that if you know the name of a rule (which you
get from the activation details), th
Ah … spotted the specific exception by going back to Nabble. I was just looking
for reasons why it might not compile. :)
To be honest the line:
> record : POC_CombineString($value.getField1(),$value.getField2())
… looks wrong. I can't work out a way in which it could compile, even if I
a
I guess it depends on whether there is a static connect() method on the
Database class which returns a DatabaseConnection, which in turn has a method
getUserRisk(POC_CombineString), which returns an instance of the TestValue
class.
On a side note, it's a very bad idea to put database calls in t
Have you tested that the rules fire when you load them as DRL?
It would probably be worth showing us what EmployeeMap looks like and the rule
which you expect to fire if there is an EmployeeMap in working memory.
The Drools version would also be useful.
Steve
On 17 Jul 2013, at 14:04, pritha.
You wouldn't need to change Guvnor source code to define rules which are
client-specific. You just need to write rules which use the client ID as a
constraint.
Steve
On 3 Jul 2013, at 17:57, Radhika Inugala wrote:
> My requirement is as below:
>
> We need to give end users to provide us wit
A knowledge agent can be used to refer to your Guvnor URL and load your rules
into a knowledge base:
http://docs.jboss.org/drools/release/5.5.0.Final/drools-guvnor-docs/html_single/#d0e3433
Within Spring, you just need to create a Spring bean/component, which has a
field referring to the knowle
I think I have a better idea of what you're trying to do now. Below is the
content of a message I sent to this list the other day. I think you might find
the technique relevant to what you are doing. i.e. Create a DSL which refers to
an enumeration which you define. That way, you get drop-down m
Is there some reason you can't just create a no-args method on the fact such as
"getReviewedContent()"? Or why the pattern match couldn't directly match on
reviewed content instead of using rules in Java to determine whether content
has been reviewed?
If you don't want to do either of those, ho
It sounds like trying the latest 6.0 beta on WAS might be a good thing for me
to check out next week. :)
On 6 Jun 2013, at 05:25, abhinay_agarwal wrote:
> hey steve,
>
> Yes the 5.3 works perfectly with was 7, just a few warning, but works fine.
> 5.3 has problem running on was 8.
>
> 5.5 ha
There's a pretty good chance that you're being redirected as a result of not
being authenticated.
As a tip on diagnosing, try using curl from the server you're deploying on, to
see what you get, like so:
Find out what happens with unauthenticated access:
curl http://whatevertheurlis/
A
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
