Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires

2011-03-17 Thread Edson Tirelli
e.BoxTest.test0(BoxTest.java:21) > > --- On *Thu, 3/17/11, Edson Tirelli * wrote: > > > From: Edson Tirelli > > Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires > To: "Rules Users List" > Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 10:47 AM >

Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires

2011-03-17 Thread Edson Tirelli
strictly prohibited. > Please notify the sender by reply e-mail or contact us by telephone and > delete this message and the files attached, without retaining a copy. > -- > > *From:* rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto: > rules-users-boun...@l

Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires

2011-03-17 Thread Greg Barton
Base(DroolsTest.java:75) at com.sample.DroolsTest.go(DroolsTest.java:31) at com.sample.BoxTest.test0(BoxTest.java:21) --- On Thu, 3/17/11, Edson Tirelli wrote: From: Edson Tirelli Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires To: "Rules Users List" Date: T

Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires

2011-03-17 Thread Edson Tirelli
Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça < > vitor.mendo...@brisa.pt>* wrote: > > > From: Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça > > Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires > To: "'Rules Users List'" > Date: Thursday, March 17, 201

Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires

2011-03-17 Thread Greg Barton
Has the performance problem with fireUntilHalt been fixed in 5.2?   --- On Thu, 3/17/11, Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça wrote: From: Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires To: "'Rules Users List'" Date: Thur

Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires

2011-03-17 Thread Edson Tirelli
der by reply e-mail or contact us by telephone and > delete this message and the files attached, without retaining a copy. > ---------- > > *From:* rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto: > rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Edson Tirelli >

Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires

2011-03-17 Thread Swindells, Thomas
Have you looked at fireUntilHalt? From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça Sent: 17 March 2011 11:20 To: 'Rules Users List' Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expir

Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires

2011-03-17 Thread Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça
_ From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli Sent: quarta-feira, 16 de Março de 2011 18:38 To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires By default, Drools does not start

Re: [rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires

2011-03-16 Thread Edson Tirelli
By default, Drools does not start any internal thread, so that you can embed it in non-multithread applications or in JEE containers. That means that the actual release of events in such cases depends on triggers. In your example, after 1h has passed, whenever something happens to the session (a

[rules-users] Basic doubt regarding Drools Fusion - @expires

2011-03-16 Thread Makewise - Vitor Rui Mendonça
Hi all! I’ve got a really basic doubt… I’ve read several documentation regarding it but I think I need some advice here… Imagine that I have an event: declare A @role( event ) @expires( 1h ) end On my Java code, I call “fireAllRules()” method every time that I put an event into the