Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0 - diagnosed with workaround (but not fixed)

On 12/1/10 6:04 PM, Tihomir Surdilovic wrote: On 12/1/10 5:09 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote: Having just looked in the Drools JIRA repository, I pretty sure that it is the same issue as was reported in JBRULES-2140 . Fix for JBRULES-2140

Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0 - diagnosed with workaround (but not fixed)

On 12/1/10 5:09 PM, Chris Selwyn wrote: Having just looked in the Drools JIRA repository, I pretty sure that it is the same issue as was reported in JBRULES-2140 . That entry has a repro. thanks for finding I am interested as to what you mean by "

Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0 - diagnosed with workaround (but not fixed)

Having just looked in the Drools JIRA repository, I pretty sure that it is the same issue as was reported in JBRULES-2140 . That entry has a repro. I am interested as to what you mean by "right around the corner"? Here is a repro anyway... package

Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0 - diagnosed with workaround (but not fixed)

Hi Chris, could you attach the repository export xml from your repo that I can use to reproduce the issue with? BRMS 5.1 (supported bits) is right around the corner and I would be able to tell you if the issue still persists with the currently tested bits for 5.1. Thanks. Tihomir On 12/1/10 4

Re: [rules-users] Rules not firing when facts asserted in a rule RHS in 5.0 - diagnosed with workaround (but not fixed)

Having spent all day on this one, I have finally got to the bottom of it. The problem is reproducible if I have /both/ a declarative fact model /and/ a function in my rules. It doesn't matter whether the function is called or not... It's presence is enough to cause the problem. Any rule that