Wolfgang Laun wrote:
2009/11/11 Mark Proctor :
Wolfgang Laun wrote:
And, perhaps, think about adding (relatively) simple things like
permitting, in DRL
import static ...;
you can already do this, but we call it import function. We just haven't
done the mapping to allow functions to be im
2009/11/11 Mark Proctor :
> Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>
> And, perhaps, think about adding (relatively) simple things like
> permitting, in DRL
>import static ...;
>
> you can already do this, but we call it import function. We just haven't
> done the mapping to allow functions to be imported from d
Wolfgang Laun wrote:
2009/11/11 Mark Proctor :
Wolfgang Laun wrote:
2009/11/10 Mark Proctor :
Wolfgang Laun wrote:
It is, however, very desirable to be able to write LHS in a more
structured way, not being forced to either repeat CEs or create
additional facts establishing secondary prope
2009/11/11 Mark Proctor :
> Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>
> 2009/11/10 Mark Proctor :
>
>
> Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>
> It is, however, very desirable to be able to write LHS in a more
> structured way, not being forced to either repeat CEs or create
> additional facts establishing secondary properties (such
Wolfgang Laun wrote:
2009/11/10 Mark Proctor :
Wolfgang Laun wrote:
It is, however, very desirable to be able to write LHS in a more
structured way, not being forced to either repeat CEs or create
additional facts establishing secondary properties (such as isAdult).
property ( ){ }
2009/11/10 Mark Proctor :
> Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>
> It is, however, very desirable to be able to write LHS in a more
> structured way, not being forced to either repeat CEs or create
> additional facts establishing secondary properties (such as isAdult).
>
> property ( ){ }
>
> and use this
Wolfgang Laun wrote:
Leo's reply reads:
"In this scenario, aren't we moving logic that would be better
expressed in a declarative form (drl) to facts that are coded in
java?"
I don't think this is an issue. Extracting a fact's property derived
from one or more constraints being true as an additi
Leonardo Gomes wrote:
I think I missed something on that post. Just posted a reply.
Cheers,
Leo.
"In this scenario, aren't we moving logic that would be better expressed
in a declarative form (drl) to facts that are coded in java?"
That facts are coded in java is incidental there use is st
Leo's reply reads:
"In this scenario, aren't we moving logic that would be better
expressed in a declarative form (drl) to facts that are coded in
java?"
I don't think this is an issue. Extracting a fact's property derived
from one or more constraints being true as an additional fact isn't
doing w
I think I missed something on that post. Just posted a reply.
Cheers,
Leo.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Mark Proctor wrote:
> Just published this, where I'm trying to explain good rule design in
> terms more familiar to software developers.
> http://blog.athico.com/2009/11/what-is-inference-
Just published this, where I'm trying to explain good rule design in
terms more familiar to software developers.
http://blog.athico.com/2009/11/what-is-inference-and-how-does-it.html
Let me know what you think, and hopefully people have other ideas they
can add back in.
Mark
__
11 matches
Mail list logo
