Re: [rules-users] single binding for or CE flagged by compiler

2009-03-16 Thread Edson Tirelli
Sorry, my focus was on the feature, so I was not clear. This is how the documentation should look overall. I will use [ ] to denote groups. Any pattern takes the form: ::= : You can combine patterns using infix or prefix CEs "and" and "or" (both forms are equivalents). Example usi

Re: [rules-users] single binding for or CE flagged by compiler

2009-03-16 Thread Wolfgang Laun
2009/3/16 Edson Tirelli > >This is an old discussion. Single binding on "or" is a non-orthogonal > special case on the language syntax that was introduced in the early days > when we only had "infix" CEs. When we started to support prefix CE, the > special case was not updated, and as a resul

RE: [rules-users] single binding for or CE flagged by compiler

2009-03-16 Thread Hehl, Thomas
ls as well. From: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 9:58 AM To: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] single binding for or CE flagged by compiler This is an old

Re: [rules-users] single binding for or CE flagged by compiler

2009-03-16 Thread Edson Tirelli
This is an old discussion. Single binding on "or" is a non-orthogonal special case on the language syntax that was introduced in the early days when we only had "infix" CEs. When we started to support prefix CE, the special case was not updated, and as a result, the single binding works only wit