Re: [rust-dev] Dataflow and bit vector

2013-05-08 Thread Niko Matsakis
The main reason that I did not use the bitv logic was because I wanted to allocate the entire set of bit vectors in one allocation. Also: I am in the process of rewriting dataflow to make use of a graph and be more reusable, so please do not modify it without discussing with me first. Niko On We

Re: [rust-dev] What parts of libuv are used ? why ?

2013-05-08 Thread Ben Noordhuis
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Brian Anderson wrote: > On 05/03/2013 09:24 PM, Thad Guidry wrote: >> >> Looks like libuv is a showstopper currently for me on Windows Cygwin >> building. >> >> Why is it used ? Should it be ? Will it be in the future ? >> >> Can someone throw up a quick paragraph

Re: [rust-dev] RFC: User-implementable format specifiers w/ compile-time checks

2013-05-08 Thread Graydon Hoare
On 13-05-07 09:49 AM, Mikhail Zabaluev wrote: > What do you think of using Rust lambdas for context-sensitive > translations? That could easily accommodate any sort of variance, and > would not complicate the fmt! syntax (though it would require another > fmt-like macro to substitute, as well as m

Re: [rust-dev] No range integer type? Saftey beyond memory?

2013-05-08 Thread Ben Lerner
Timely bug: today's explanation of the Diablo3 gold-duping market crash. http://pastebin.com/YYPM4uQK On 4/29/2013 10:43 PM, Jack Moffitt wrote: For the most part, nobody checks. They weighed the cost of those errors against the potential performance loss and decided they would prefer to go fa

Re: [rust-dev] No range integer type? Saftey beyond memory?

2013-05-08 Thread Jack Moffitt
I was just going to post that as well. This is also exactly the kind of thing that checked arithmetic performance would not be an issue for. jack. On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Ben Lerner wrote: > Timely bug: today's explanation of the Diablo3 gold-duping market crash. > http://pastebin.com/YY

Re: [rust-dev] Download statistics

2013-05-08 Thread Graydon Hoare
On 13-05-07 09:12 AM, Sanghyeon Seo wrote: > I asked about this in January > https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2013-January/002879.html > and was told 1) request logging was disabled 2) it will probably not be > interesting before the next release. > > It has been a month since 0.6 relea

Re: [rust-dev] rusti: a call to action

2013-05-08 Thread Lindsey Kuper
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:01 AM, James Tranovich wrote: > Hello all, > > What can I do to help make rusti "halfway tolerable"? > > Not to belabor the point, but rusti definitely needs some love -- my git > version of rusti as of one or two days ago always crashes with > "memory_region::~memory_reg