Hi all, (resending from different email address; there seems to be a
problem with my other address)
I don't know if this has been discussed, but I noticed an unpleasant
interaction between private fields in the implementation of things like
pointer types and auto-dereferencing.
The example I
I'm trying to learn Rust by doing a project I call "iron-santa" (
https://github.com/brycefisher/iron-santa) that parses RSS feeds from
Craigslist. I work on both a 64 bit Ubuntu 12.04 machine and a MacBook Pro
OS 10.8, and I have the latest nightlies installed on both machines. I'm
running into wh
Are you sure you have the exact same rustc on each machine? Even if it
was from a different day, this could happen, because that change is
_very_ recent.
___
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Patrick Walton wrote:
> You can use "extern "Rust" fn" (or ||:'static) to achieve something like
> C++03 member function pointers without the lifetimes. Attacking Rust
> without asking first how to do this is unappreciated.
>
I think that characterizing this as
Hi Patrick,
Thanks for your answer! See comments below.
On 2014-05-23 06:12, Patrick Walton wrote:
> You can use "extern "Rust" fn" (or ||:'static) to achieve something like
> C++03 member function pointers without the lifetimes.
Do I understand correctly that by "extern "Rust" fn" you m
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks for the support and encouragement!
After spending days (evenings to be more precise ;-) wrestling with the
compiler & trying different workarounds to implement at least some form
of Qt5 bindings it's possible there's some frustration present in the
post, but as explicitly
This looks like a legitimate problem. Have you filed an issue on the GitHub
issues page? https://github.com/mozilla/rust/issues/new
-Kevin
On May 23, 2014, at 6:04 AM, Paulo Sérgio Almeida wrote:
> Hi all, (resending from different email address; there seems to be a
> problem with my othe
