ke_unique("Peter");
...and, what about shared-ownership?
If the author informs all this, I would think that there is no bad
intention, but he doesn't, and he uses the ugliest C++ code possible.
So it makes me think that the article is malicious and it is pure marketing
stuff.
Reg
Then, you could show this in the article, using the "good" subset of C++.
Then people can choose.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Steve Klabnik wrote:
> Part of the issue with that statement is that you may or may not
> program in this way. Yes, people choose certain subsets of C++ that
> are
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Steve Klabnik wrote:
> Oh, Patrick, I slightly mis-read what you said. Yes, that was the
> intention.
>
> > I think official documentation shouldn't be directly trying to "sell"
> Rust against other languages,
>
> While I agree, comparing against things we already k
I don't have the Steve's email address.
Please could someone provide it.
Thanks.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:41 AM, Fernando Pelliccioni wrote:
> What about "Feedback very welcome on the rust-dev mailing list or on
> Twitter." ?
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:3
What about "Feedback very welcome on the rust-dev mailing list or on
Twitter." ?
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Patrick Walton wrote:
> On 3/2/14 8:34 PM, Fernando Pelliccioni wrote:
>
>> This is a misleading propaganda against C++. I think it's pure marketing.
erent place (mailing list), the reader of the
article does not have a chance to really compare the two languages.
Regards,
Fernando Pelliccioni,
___
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
