Perfect!
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Clark Gaebel wrote:
> These are the semantics of a boxed value.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Wink Saville wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Paul Colomiets
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Win
Cool, I've been following capn proto and have used protobufs a little. This
is the direction of what I'm thinking and I'm wondering if the rust notion
of
ownership can be leveraged in message passing. Hence my silly questions.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Tony Arcieri wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29
These are the semantics of a boxed value.
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Wink Saville wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Paul Colomiets wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Wink Saville wrote:
>> > Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm
>> inte
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Paul Colomiets wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Wink Saville wrote:
> > Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm
> interested in
> > a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like to create
> an
> > embedded
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Wink Saville wrote:
> Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm interested
> in a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like to create
> an embedded OS using rust and not use C if possible
>
You might take a look at capnproto
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Wink Saville wrote:
> Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm interested in
> a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like to create an
> embedded OS using rust and not use C if possible.
>
I think even if there will
Nanomsg looks interesting and I'll take a closer look. But I'm interested
in a pure rust implementation of async messaging because I'd like to create
an embedded OS using rust and not use C if possible.
I been thinking about the problem and one of the questions I have is how to
transfer ownership
I havn't looked at it in detail, but nanomsg [1] seems to cover these
requirements. There's a rust binding [2] available too.
Regards, Heiko
[1] http://nanomsg.org
[2] https://github.com/thehydroimpulse/nanomsg.rs
On 28 Sep 2014, at 03:54, Wink Saville wrote:
> I'd like to have one API whic
I'd like to have one API which would allow sending/receiving messages
asynchronously, safely and efficiently over any transport and should work
for components that run in the same thread, different threads, different
processes or between devices which might be connected via any arbitrary
hardware.
