Re: [rust-dev] Fwd: Re: Naming convention for libraries

2011-11-08 Thread Brian Anderson
- Original Message - From: "Graydon Hoare" To: rust-dev@mozilla.org Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2011 8:16:31 AM Subject: Re: [rust-dev] Fwd: Re: Naming convention for libraries On 01/11/2011 12:31 PM, Brian Anderson wrote: > To clarify, I looked up the proposed naming sc

Re: [rust-dev] Fwd: Re: Naming convention for libraries

2011-11-08 Thread Graydon Hoare
On 01/11/2011 12:31 PM, Brian Anderson wrote: To clarify, I looked up the proposed naming scheme and it's 'libname-hash-version.so' where the hash is a hash of the exported metadata (type hashes don't come into play here). Yes, this is the way the compiler *should* be producing libraries by d

[rust-dev] Fwd: Re: Naming convention for libraries

2011-11-01 Thread Brian Anderson
I accidentally took this discussion off-list. Here's some further explanation of rust's versioning. On 11/01/2011 10:23 AM, Brendan Eich wrote: On Nov 1, 2011, at 10:16 AM, Brian Anderson wrote: On 11/01/2011 10:04 AM, Brendan Eich wrote: On Nov 1, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Patrick Walton wrote: