Re: [rust-dev] Partial meeting agenda - older RFCs

2014-07-03 Thread Gábor Lehel
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Brian Anderson bander...@mozilla.com wrote: On 07/02/2014 11:19 AM, Gábor Lehel wrote: Thanks, this is a good step, as is delaying taking actions by a day as proposed in the meeting itself. If you have any suggestions for how this regular email or the

Re: [rust-dev] Partial meeting agenda - older RFCs

2014-07-03 Thread Gábor Lehel
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Nick Cameron li...@ncameron.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Gábor Lehel glaebho...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, this is a good step, as is delaying taking actions by a day as proposed in the meeting itself. If you have any suggestions for how

Re: [rust-dev] Partial meeting agenda - older RFCs

2014-07-02 Thread Gábor Lehel
Thanks, this is a good step, as is delaying taking actions by a day as proposed in the meeting itself. If you have any suggestions for how this regular email or the process in general could be improved, please let us know. Most fundamentally, what I'm wondering is, why do most of the things

Re: [rust-dev] Partial meeting agenda - older RFCs

2014-07-02 Thread Kevin Cantu
Possibly some of this is driven by how GitHub automatically spams a large number of people with the conversations. While I'm sure the core team is more patient than me, I don't want to listen to twenty years worth of debate about semicolons in a dead RFC. ;D Kevin On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at

Re: [rust-dev] Partial meeting agenda - older RFCs

2014-07-02 Thread Brian Anderson
On 07/02/2014 11:19 AM, Gábor Lehel wrote: Thanks, this is a good step, as is delaying taking actions by a day as proposed in the meeting itself. If you have any suggestions for how this regular email or the process in general could be improved, please let us know. Most

Re: [rust-dev] Partial meeting agenda - older RFCs

2014-07-02 Thread Nick Cameron
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Gábor Lehel glaebho...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks, this is a good step, as is delaying taking actions by a day as proposed in the meeting itself. If you have any suggestions for how this regular email or the process in general could be improved, please let us

Re: [rust-dev] Partial meeting agenda - older RFCs

2014-07-02 Thread Daniel Fagnan
I never thought a change like the one I proposed would be accepted. That was until a few people also supported the idea so it was a shot in the dark. My motivation for the rfc was the supposed elimination of the ambiguities that the current syntax has. I mistakenly overlooked the conflict with

[rust-dev] Partial meeting agenda - older RFCs

2014-06-30 Thread Nick Cameron
Hi all, there have recently been some calls to be more open about the Rust meetings, in particular to publish the agenda beforehand. The agenda setting has been quite informal, often not coming together until the meeting starts. Not to say that we won't publish an agenda in the future, but that it