Hello,
I'm relatively new to Rust, and this is the first time I've posted on
this list. For my senior honors thesis, I would like to improve Rust
so that it can be used on microcontrollers and other small embedded
systems. This is a sector dominated by C and has seen little change
for quite a
I would rather see Atmel AVR or ARM Cortex M0 as targets.
Also, would low voltage, low power 8-bit targets with under 512KB ram be
impossible ?
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Thomas Daede daede...@umn.edu wrote:
Hello,
I'm relatively new to Rust, and this is the first time I've posted
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Thad Guidry thadgui...@gmail.com wrote:
I would rather see Atmel AVR or ARM Cortex M0 as targets.
Would need an LLVM backend for AVR. A quick google found
http://sourceforge.net/projects/avr-llvm/ though. I don't know
anything about it though.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Thad Guidry thadgui...@gmail.com wrote:
I would rather see Atmel AVR or ARM Cortex M0 as targets.
Also, would low voltage, low power 8-bit targets with under 512KB ram be
impossible ?
Where are you finding 8-bit targets with 512KB ram? Generally they
have 8K
I was thinking more of Industrial systems VS. Gadgetry Robotics projects.
No problems. Getting support for the M0 will be important long term is
what I am saying.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Thomas Daede daede...@umn.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Thad Guidry
On 06/21/2013 08:20 AM, Thomas Daede wrote:
Hello,
I'm relatively new to Rust, and this is the first time I've posted on
this list. For my senior honors thesis, I would like to improve Rust
so that it can be used on microcontrollers and other small embedded
systems. This is a sector dominated
On 21 June 2013 22:17, Brian Anderson bander...@mozilla.com wrote:
- Adding compatibility with the newlib C library
Last time this came up we preferred musl.
https://github.com/mozilla/rust/issues/7283
Musl isn't really comparable to Newlib. Newlib is (relatively) easy to
port to platforms
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Brian Anderson bander...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 06/21/2013 08:20 AM, Thomas Daede wrote:
- Compiling runtime and Core without thread support
This is a major refactoring project which isn't made any easier by the
current situation in which we have 2 entire
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Daede daede...@umn.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Brian Anderson bander...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 06/21/2013 08:20 AM, Thomas Daede wrote:
- Compiling runtime and Core without thread support
This is a major refactoring project which isn't
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Thomas Daede daede...@umn.edu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Brian Anderson bander...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 06/21/2013 08:20 AM, Thomas Daede wrote:
- Compiling runtime and Core without thread support
This is a major refactoring project which isn't
On 06/21/2013 02:53 PM, Thomas Daede wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Brian Anderson bander...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 06/21/2013 08:20 AM, Thomas Daede wrote:
- Compiling runtime and Core without thread support
This is a major refactoring project which isn't made any easier by the
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Brian Anderson bander...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 06/21/2013 02:53 PM, Thomas Daede wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Brian Anderson bander...@mozilla.com
wrote:
On 06/21/2013 08:20 AM, Thomas Daede wrote:
- Compiling runtime and Core without thread
12 matches
Mail list logo
