SZÉPE Viktor wrote in <20181212003705.Horde.HZm_4N1dy34_rA705nkSCpH@sze\
pe.net>:
|Idézem/Quoting Ralph Corderoy :
|>> Then problem on my side, i should add an MX entry for
|>> lists.sdaoden.eu which points to lists.sdaoden.eu not sdaoden.eu.
|>> My knowledge of DNS is a bit rusty.
|>
|>
Ralph Corderoy wrote in <20181211232526.98e5e21...@orac.inputplus.co.uk>:
|> Then problem on my side, i should add an MX entry for
|> lists.sdaoden.eu which points to lists.sdaoden.eu not sdaoden.eu.
|> My knowledge of DNS is a bit rusty.
|
|Mine too.
|
|$ dig +nocomment
Hi SZÉPE,
> > If not MX for foo.com exists then foo.com's port 25 is contacted
> > directly, so an MX for foo.com defined as foo.com seems unnecessary.
>
> Excuse me, I object!
> If you do internet mailing in the 21st century you *should* add an MX
> record (and use SPF, DKIM and DMARC)
I assume
