Thanks for your comments Nicolas! Some of my thoughts...
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> - self._monomial_coefficients is specific to the
>CombinatorialFreeModule implementation. But you can use directly
>x[k] to get the coefficient of k in an element x of a module with
>basis.
Very good
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 03:58:32PM -0500, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> > phi is constructed from f, which itself can't be pickled:
> Thanks for your help on this!
My pleasure :-)
> I now have a patch up at
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7914
>
> in case you want to see if I understoo
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> phi is constructed from f, which itself can't be pickled:
Thanks for your help on this! I now have a patch up at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7914
in case you want to see if I understood you. :)
Cheers,
Jason
--
You received this message b
On Jan 9, 3:58 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> > I get the following with sage-4.3, is it normal to have [2, 1] and [1,
> > 2] as partitions ?
>
> > {{{
> > sage: for p in Partitions(3, max_slope=1):
> > : print p
> > ..
Dear Tim, dear sage-combinat,
>> The huge speed differnce can be seen here:
>>
>> {{{
>> sage: timeit('[Combinations(range(i), j).list() for (i, j) in
>> CartesianProduct(range(15), range(15))]')
>> 5 loops, best of 3: 449 ms per loop
>>
>> sage: timeit('[combinations(range(i), j) f
Hi Jason!
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 12:19:36PM -0500, Jason Bandlow wrote:
> While working on this, I added a ``TestSuite(phi)`` test where ``phi``
> is a TriangularModuleMorphism, mimicking what was done for
> DiagonalModuleMorphism.
Good idea!
> Unfortunately, pickling fails. I don't re
Dear Tim,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:58:23PM +0800, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
>I've been wondering why sage.combinat.combinat.combinations still exists,
>when sage.combinat.combination.Combinations is much faster, being native
>Sage code, and thus not requiring GAP interfacing (a
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> Hey Jason,
> In fact, I was about to send you an e-mail for two things :-)
>
> - Warn you about the rebase + little fixes in
>triangular-morphisms-jb.patch and ask you about your time-line for
>finalizing it.
While working on this, I added a ``TestSuite(p
