On 1/31/11 8:57 AM, Daniel Bump wrote:
Anne wrote:
If it is more convenient for you, I can include it into 10485.
This might be more strategic for speed of getting it merged. I emailed
you a revised .png file in a private message.
Thank you. I included it in the working thematic tutorial p
> I don't know if it's helpful to post so much code, but here is my code
> for the Demazure character and rank 2 plotting. The Demazure character
> code contains the same idea as bump's code.
There were a couple of mistakes in the code snippet that I posted.
Here is another attempt, probably cor
Hi all,
Thanks for the replies. I'm on the sage-combinat-devel list now.
I don't know if it's helpful to post so much code, but here is my code
for the Demazure character and rank 2 plotting. The Demazure character
code contains the same idea as bump's code.
def demazure(ch, i):
"""
EXAM
Anne wrote:
> If it is more convenient for you, I can include it into 10485.
This might be more strategic for speed of getting it merged. I emailed
you a revised .png file in a private message.
Dan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-de
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 07:05:27AM -0800, bump wrote:
> No, the WeylCharacterRing is the representation ring of the Lie
> group. A basis is indexed by dominant characters. The WeightRing
> is the group algebra of the lattice.
Oops, thanks for catching this; I indeed meant WeightRing.
Cheers,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 06:11:18AM -0800, Daniel Bump wrote:
> The code snippet I posted does not assume #7922.
Yup, only my comments about it :-)
> At this moment #7922 needs work since it changes the syntax of a few
> things enough to break some tests in the tutorial #8442, which has
> been mer
Nicolas wrote:
> This looks very related to what Vivianne (and Adrien and Nicolas) is
> implementing around Schubert polynomials and the like. Vivianne: can
> you already compute demazure characters with your code?
> (WeylCharacterRing is basically the group algebra of the ambient
> lattice)? If
> Ops, but all those comments are assuming that #7922 is applied,
> which I still haven't reviewed ... Ok, that going up my TODO pile ...
The code snippet I posted does not assume #7922.
At this moment #7922 needs work since it changes the
syntax of a few things enough to break some tests in
Dear Adrien, Anne, Benjamin, Dan, Vivianne, Nicolas, ...
We should make sure to keep Benjamin in CC, since I am not sure he is
on sage-combinat-devel (I bounced his message which was originally on
sage-devel).
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 04:07:09PM -0800, bump wrote:
> I too needed some code
