Salut,
to anyone who might be interested in working with cluster algebras or
quivers in sage:
Gregg Musiker and myself recently finished the work on a first version
of a cluster algebra and quiver package. We provide a description
including mathematical background in a compendium which is now
ava
> Could you please reconcile this with the patch at #9370? That implemented a
> latex prefix and various other things. (If you felt like refereeing #9370 at
> the same time, that would be helpful, too.)
Thanks for letting me know. I will fold my patch into yours, if that's
okay for you.
Christia
On Friday, February 25, 2011 1:28:06 PM UTC-8, Christian Stump wrote:
>
> > > Is it okay if I open a ticket on that and provide a fix?
> >
> > Yes, please fix CombinatorialFreeModule!
> > > Is there a way to provide a "latex prefix" in addition to the prefix
> > > for CombinatorialFreeModule
> > Is it okay if I open a ticket on that and provide a fix?
>
> Yes, please fix CombinatorialFreeModule!
> > Is there a way to provide a "latex prefix" in addition to the prefix
> > for CombinatorialFreeModule in order to get the alpha shown as an
> > \alpha? Should I add this functionality as w
> - Is it reasonnable that hash is called 4 000 000 times in your
>example? Are there huge elements being manipulated?
No, I don't think that is reasonable. So there must be something
fishy going on.
The character of A7 (SL(8)) in question has 792 weights with nonzero
coefficient. This is n
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:23:15AM -0800, Christian Stump wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there is a bug in the latex method for CombinatorialFreeModule that
> prevents elements in the root lattice to be shown in the notebook.
>
> sage: R = RootSystem(['A',3])
> sage: L = R.root_lattice()
> sage: L.simple_ro
Hi Dan!
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:35:08AM -0800, Daniel Bump wrote:
> I am returning to the question of timing issues with #7922.
>
> I recall that for a variety of branching rules, I ran tests
> with and without the test, and obtained the following
> results:
>
> Old Code
On 2/24/11 9:19 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:00:32PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
I just realized a strange error after application of #10632.
Viewing Kirillov-Reshetikhin crystals themselves works fine.
However, viewing their tensor products is broken after the applic
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:56:29AM -0500, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> I just look at it. The ticket suggest to separate the pickle jar into
> smaller pickle jar : one per Sage version. Why not one pickle jar per
> module and submodule?
The point is not to split the pickle jar in smaller chunks, but t
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:39:10PM -0500, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> This might not be the case anymore. Indeed, this week, Jeroen wrote in
> #10354 [1] :
>
> "Instead of providing a whole new pickle jar, could you make a tarball
> containing only the new pickles? I would prefer that for merging as
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:08:35AM -0800, Daniel Bump wrote:
> > - In the root and weight lattice, the default coordinate system
> >should be given by the natural basis. I.e. in the root lattice in
> >rank 2, alpha_1 should have coordinates (0,1) and alpha_2 (1,0).
>
> What basis is this?
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:00:32PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> I just realized a strange error after application of #10632.
> Viewing Kirillov-Reshetikhin crystals themselves works fine.
> However, viewing their tensor products is broken after the application
> of the patch. Without the patch, t
Hi Mitesh!
Wow, I am really late in my e-mails
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:01:09AM -0600, Mitesh Patel wrote:
> On 11/14/2010 09:26 AM, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> > In this scheme, there could also exists a global repository which take
> > care of all sub-branches (with multiple and i
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:17:54AM -0800, Benjamin Jones wrote:
> I've looked over the plot code in WeightLatticeRealization. I think
> perhaps the two sets of plotting code could co-exist, one in
> RootLatticeRealization (or wherever) and mine in WeylCharacterRing.
> The two sets of code have some
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:37:00AM -0800, Benjamin Jones wrote:
> It sounds to me like I should remove my `plot` method from Trac
> #10744, leaving the demazure character there, and start a new ticket
> to:
>
> a) move the existing plot code there to RootLatticeRealization
> b) update that code in
15 matches
Mail list logo
