Thanks, Nicolas! With three opinions the majority is much more obvious
than with two ;-)
Andrey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe fro
> Can you elaborate? Is there a compelling technical reason?
Well, what you are suggesting is a little tricky. Two
rings will be created at the same time, and the
multiplication will be implemented by coercing from
the WeylCharacterRing to the WeightRing, multiplying,
and coercing back. And I see
Hi Andrey!
(oups, I see that I misspelled your name recently; sorry!)
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:42:27AM -0700, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> We have a heated debate on http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10140
> regarding the following issue.
>
> When a user writes
>
> Cone(rays=[(
Dear posets friends,
I am in the process of creating categories for posets/lattices/... in
preparation for later having several classes for posets, including
infinite/lazy/... (see e.g. #10783, #10777). The patch will also
include quite some code from Christian, Frédéric, Franco. The plan
Hi Dan,
Sorry for letting this slip down my mailbox ...
Florent: please see the intersphinx question below.
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 06:48:56AM -0800, Daniel Bump wrote:
> As I noted earlier, the timing issue is apparently fixed by
> making _weight_multiplicities a cached method, and the
