Hi Anne,
On 27 Mrz., 00:39, Anne Schilling a...@math.ucdavis.edu wrote:
Hi Simon,
I am not sure this is the smallest example, but I get some error messages when
playing with the quotients:
sage: n=3
sage: F = FreeAlgebra(ZZ,n,'x',implementation='letterplace')
That's the other restriction
On 27 Mrz., 08:11, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
I guess, what I should do is to test at the beginning of the
groebner_basis method whether we have a field, and give a clear error
message. Also I should mention that restriction in the doc string of
the groebner_basis method.
Udate
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:35:18PM -0700, Simon King wrote:
On 27 Mrz., 08:11, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
I guess, what I should do is to test at the beginning of the
groebner_basis method whether we have a field, and give a clear error
message. Also I should mention that
Hi Simon,
Thanks for the explanation! Everything seems to work fine now.
I gave a positive review on trac for the added features, perhaps
someone else could do a technical review of the patch.
Best,
Anne
On 3/26/11 11:11 PM, Simon King wrote:
Hi Anne,
On 27 Mrz., 00:39, Anne
Hi!
I just added a new patch on trac which implements the Schuetzenberger
involution on both words and tableaux and also the promotion operator
on tableaux of arbitrary shape:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10446
This was started during Sage Days 26 in Seattle last December with
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 12:00:37PM -0700, Simon King wrote:
Anyway, I agree with you that my question should be answered in a
practical way and can not really have a categorical answer. That's
why I formulated are free algebras and polynomial rings too
different? in my original question.
I just added a new patch on trac which implements the Schuetzenberger
involution on both words and tableaux and also the promotion operator
on tableaux of arbitrary shape:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10446
I have the impression this is for Type A only. But the Schutzenberger
