In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.combinat.devel, you wrote:
> I tried to do some computations with the existing Iwahori-Hecke
> algebra module inside sage earlier this year. I needed to work over
> the rational function field C(x), for an indeterminate x. In the end I
> gave up and went back to using
On 2/15/12 2:38 PM, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Hi Florent,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
>>> I pushed the first framework of the code (some methods are still missing),
>>> but I get some doc-test failures regarding categories which I am not sure
>>> how to fix.
>>> I think the problem is that the e
Hi Florent,
Thanks for your answer.
>> I pushed the first framework of the code (some methods are still missing),
>> but I get some doc-test failures regarding categories which I am not sure
>> how to fix.
>> I think the problem is that the elements LinearExtensionsOfPoset are not in
>> its par
Hi Anne,
> I pushed the first framework of the code (some methods are still missing),
> but I get some doc-test failures regarding categories which I am not sure how
> to fix.
> I think the problem is that the elements LinearExtensionsOfPoset are not in
> its parent,
> but I am not sure ho
On 2/14/12 2:33 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:05:21PM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
>> No. It is really a different poset, see:
>> ...
>> which returns the original poset. But to_poset gives Q from the above
>> computation.
>
> Ok; out of curiosity, why do you need the
