> In part. But more importantly because LinearExtensionsOfPoset accepts
> a list as input, and lists are not hashable. So class call needs to
> transform it into a tuple before passing it down to
> UniqueRepresentation. See the documentation of UniqueRepresentation
> for details.
Ok, thank you!
>
Hi Anne,
> Thanks! The only problem is that when it is not yet imported one gets the
> same error and hence it is hard to locate:
You should use "search_src":
sage: search_src("ClonableInt")
sets/finite_set_map_cy.pxd:14:from sage.structure.list_clone cimport
ClonableIntArray
sets/finite_
On 2/18/12 9:40 AM, Nicolas Borie wrote:
> Le samedi 18 février 2012 à 09:29 -0800, Anne Schilling a écrit :
>> Which patch is ClonableIntArray in? For me it is not defined (and I am
>> hesitant to base my
>> code on something not yet in sage):
>>
>> sage: class toto(ClonableIntArray):
>> :
I have some other problems with the view command:
sage: P = Poset(([1,2], [[1,2]]), cover_relations = True)
sage: H = P.hasse_diagram()
sage: H._latex_() == P._latex_()
True
sage: view(H)
works, but
sage: view(P)
blows up
An error occurred.
This is pdfTeXk, Version 3.1415926-1.40.9 (Web2C 7.5.
Great, thanks! I now added a _latex_ method to FinitePosets. However, without
my patch
applied I get doc test failures in /combinat/posets/posets.py which did not
happen
before. Did something substantial change that causes these failures?
Cheers,
Anne
posets anne$ hg qtop
trac_9280-graded-alg
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 06:40:17PM +0100, Nicolas Borie wrote:
> Le samedi 18 février 2012 à 09:29 -0800, Anne Schilling a écrit :
> > Which patch is ClonableIntArray in? For me it is not defined (and I am
> > hesitant to base my
> > code on something not yet in sage):
> >
> > sage: class toto(Cl
Le samedi 18 février 2012 à 09:29 -0800, Anne Schilling a écrit :
> Which patch is ClonableIntArray in? For me it is not defined (and I am
> hesitant to base my
> code on something not yet in sage):
>
> sage: class toto(ClonableIntArray):
> : def check(self): pass
> :
> --
On 2/17/12 12:13 AM, Florent Hivert wrote:
>>> By the way: changing P.linear_extensions() to return an enumerated set
>>> rather than a plain list could make sense, assuming there is no speed
>>> loss. This might require a bit of cythonification; maybe using
>>> ClonableArray will be enough. It's s
2012/2/18, Nicolas M. Thiery :
> Hi Florent, Vincent,
>
> All my edits in the series file to carefully craft guards on the
> patches that are already merged in 5.0 got discarded in one of the
> recent merge!
>
> I reinstated them, so the queue should work again ...
That should be me! I made
Hi Florent, Vincent,
All my edits in the series file to carefully craft guards on the
patches that are already merged in 5.0 got discarded in one of the
recent merge!
I reinstated them, so the queue should work again ...
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiér
Finally I implemented two decorators : one for functions and one for
methods and everything seems to work. The last version is in
sage-combinat queue.
I have to write down documentation but the ticket should be finalized today.
If you have any remark on naming convention, architecture, possible
i
11 matches
Mail list logo
