Hello everybody !!!
There's something in the air these days that has led people around me
to inquire about the availability of a feature in Sage's support of LP
: iterate/count integer solutions. There is no way for me to work on
that at the moment because of a job application I am working on,
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.combinat.devel, you wrote:
Hello everybody !!!
There's something in the air these days that has led people around me
to inquire about the availability of a feature in Sage's support of LP
: iterate/count integer solutions. There is no way for me to work on
Hi Nathann
On 03/16/12 11:06, Nathann Cohen wrote:
the availability of a feature in Sage's support of LP
: iterate/count integer solutions.
SCIP already has counting/enumeration of integer solutions built-in.
Because of the license issues, it will probably never be a standard
package, but it
I was messing a little with sage/categories/weyl_groups.py and hit a
bunch of doctest errors,
all apparently caused by an EXAMPLE:: reference to
sage.combinat.sf.all.SFAMonomial.
I tried to fix them by adding
from sage.combinat.sf.all import SFAMonomial
The test
$ sage -t
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:44:18AM -0700, Mark Shimozono wrote:
I was messing a little with sage/categories/weyl_groups.py and hit a
bunch of doctest errors,
Which patch are you at?
all apparently caused by an EXAMPLE:: reference to
sage.combinat.sf.all.SFAMonomial.
I tried to fix them by
Nicolas,
Thanks for the tutorial on imports.
That was excellent info.
Here is a better question:
What could cause the following disturbing error?
m = sage.combinat.sf.all.SFAMonomial(QQ)
NameError: global name 'sage' is not defined
--Mark
--
You received this message because you
Nicolas,
In doctests.
--Mark
Here is a better question:
What could cause the following disturbing error?
m = sage.combinat.sf.all.SFAMonomial(QQ)
NameError: global name 'sage' is not defined
In code, in the interpreter, or in doctests?
Cheers,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 12:09:10PM -0400, msh...@math.vt.edu wrote:
In doctests.
Weird; it works for me. Please send me off line the full file. Or just
use the right idiom :-)
sage: SymmetricFunctions(QQ).m()
(ok, just a workaround; but we want to eventually get rid of those SFA*).
My God, how did this email end up here ? O_o
Looks like Nicolas forwarded it. Well, anyway now everybdy's aware that I
am applying for a position in France :-D
For the moment I am only thinking of CPLEX, but perhaps LattE would be
doable later, as you say...
Short of that, I *really*
Nicolas,
I have reverted to a version of the file that is not modified by
my latest patch (it modified a different file).
I am at the top of the stack of patches;
just removed my sage tree and rebuilt it and
reinstalled sage-combinat and updated.
My sage doesn't seem to know about the direct
Hi Mark,
When you say top you mean that all patches are applied in the sage-combinat
queue?
Do you have the problems if you do
sage -hg qpop -a
sage -b
If not, then there is most likely some patch in the queue that breaks this.
Best,
Anne
On 3/16/12 1:13 PM, msh...@math.vt.edu wrote:
Nicolas,
And the winning patch (the one before which all doctests pass,
and after which things are broken), is (drum roll please):
trac_11109-stable-grothendieck-polynomials-nt.patch
I'll take a closer look at it.
--Mark
Do you have the problems if you do
sage -hg qpop -a
sage -b
If
12 matches
Mail list logo
